Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow LAN & WAN arrow LAN & WAN Features arrow Fast Network Adapters - What's Holding You Back?
Fast Network Adapters - What's Holding You Back? Print E-mail
Tim Higgins   
June 19, 2002

Time to spend some money...

To test whether a laptop of more current design would eliminate this unbalance, we obtained a Dell Insprion 4100 with 1GHz Celeron CPU, 128MB of RAM, and running WinXP Home. Plot 2 shows the same test as Plot 1, but run with the Dell in place of the Compaq laptop. There's clearly still a send, receive imbalance, but the percentange differences are smaller, and average speeds are significantly higher. It's also interesting to note that the receive test has smaller variation in this case. Note also that in order to control the number of variables in the test, we used the Linksys adapter for this test, even though the Dell comes with a 10/100 adapter built in.

Dell: Receive vs Send

Plot 2: Dell laptop - Receive vs Send

To see if we could get a better feel for the relationship between processor speed and network throughput, we ran tests between three pairs of machines:

  • "dell" is the previously described laptop (1GHz Celeron)
  • "pat" is a Compaq Presario 5451 with 500MHz AMD-K6-2, 252MB RAM, Win98SE, and Netgear FA310TX PCI Fast Ethernet adapter
  • "rat" is the previously described Compaq Deskpro (733MHz Pentium III)

The results shown in Plot 3 show that the pairing of 500 and 733MHz machines turn in the slowest performance. Next best is the 500 and 1GHz pairing, followed by the best performance via the matchup of 733MHz and 1GHz machines. Although it's surprising that it took two over-500MHz machines to get at least 50Mbps network throughput in both directions, we can't really say that these results represent a hard rule, given all the variables in the experiment. But it's clear that faster is better!

Multi-pair comparison

Plot 3: Dell laptop - Receive vs Send


Tags: 802.11a, LAN, network adapter, WiFi,

Related Articles:

How We Test 802.11a Wireless Products
How We Test HomePlug Networking Equipment
How We Test Hardware Routers
Can a New WiFi Adapter Change Your Wireless Performance?
How We Test 802.11b and 11g Wireless LAN Products - Revision 1
 

Most Read

 
 

Over At The Forums

Are Cat6 and Cat5e not perfectly compatible?
So, I was rearranging some of my network today (notably moving my router to a different room) and I noticed something very odd. When I...

Captive portal for security
I've read about this in the previous Bed & Breakfast thread. Our company wants to get wireless going on one of the floors. There is only personal...

D-Link DNS-323 Mysteries
Hello folks. I'm having issues with my Nas and looking for some thoughts. 1. The 323 gets recognised by Vista as a network device but...

Gigabit Network Help!
I have a gigabit NAS (D-link 323) that I have connected to a D-Link DGS-1005D gigabit switch. I then have my desktop connected to...

Synology DS-209+ review up!!
Looks real good. Now Netgear needs to play catchup and dump that old Infrant CPU for something more modern and powerful!! http://www.trustedreviews.com/networ...ion-DS-209-/p1

Slideshows

NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro Western Digital ShareSpace QNAP TS-509 Pro D-Link DNS-343 4-Bay Network Storage Enclosure Thecus N3200 RAID 5 NAS D-Link DIR-628 RangeBooster N Dual Band Router More

Win This!

Enter to Win!

You could win a Trendnet TEW-633GR Wireless N Gigabit Router and two TEW-621PC 300Mbps Wireless N-Draft PC Cards

Learn How!

 

Ldr:0.00178503990173, Rct:0.0102510452271, Sky:0.0120601654053, Tlink:0.236911058426, TopPG:0.237008094788, GQV:0.237178087234 seconds to load.