Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow NAS arrow NAS Reviews arrow Head to Head: Tritton's ASAP vs. ioGEAR's BOSS
Head to Head: Tritton's ASAP vs. ioGEAR's BOSS Print E-mail
Tim Higgins   
March 02, 2004

Introduction

Tritton Advanced Server Appliance with WebServer

Tritton Advanced Server Appliance with WebServer
Summary SPI-based router with IPsec and PPTP VPN endpoints and 120GB NAS. Also supports Web and FTP serving.
Update 4/14/2004 - Corrected NAS throughput result observations (again).

3/5/2004 - New firmware released by ioGEAR and Tritton. ASAP has new packaging. Corrected NAS throughput observations. Other miscellaneous changes.

Pros • Fast routing speed
• Supports two WAN IP addresses (Multi-NAT)
• Priced comparably to separate solutions
Cons • File sharing is exposed to WAN
• No DMZ
• No port range forwarding
• Limited file sharing privilege control
• Admin requires Internet Explorer

In their search for ways to differentiate themselves (and improve their miserably thin margins), networking product manufacturers are once again venturing into bundling network storage capability into their routing offerings. This idea of a combination router / file server isn't new, given that SMC and Linksys both fielded very similar products (OEM'd from Sercomm) back in 2001.

But if I remember correctly, the first-generation product - I tested SMC's SMC7208SBR Broadband Storage Server - was expensive, insecure, large, noisy and didn't really take off. U.S. Robotics' USR8200 Secure Storage Router Pro recently attempted to re-establish the router / storage combo category but requires you to bring your own storage - in the form of a USB2.0 hard drive.

Tritton's All in One Server Appliance (ASAP) and ioGEAR's Broadband Office Storage Server (BOSS) represent the latest incarnation of this product category, which now has the intended-to-be-less-scary "appliance" moniker. Unfortunately, though drive sizes have increased from 20GB to 120GB over three years, little else seems to have changed...



Tags: Iogear, NAS, router, Tritton,

Related Articles:

U.S. Robotics USR-8200 Secure Storage Router Pro reviewed
XIMETA NetDisk Office reviewed
SMC Barricade Plus Cable/DSL Broadband router Review
Linksys BEFVP41 EtherFast Cable/DSL VPN Router
Slideshow - Linksys RVS4000
 

Most Read

 
 

Over At The Forums

Are Cat6 and Cat5e not perfectly compatible?
So, I was rearranging some of my network today (notably moving my router to a different room) and I noticed something very odd. When I...

Captive portal for security
I've read about this in the previous Bed & Breakfast thread. Our company wants to get wireless going on one of the floors. There is only personal...

D-Link DNS-323 Mysteries
Hello folks. I'm having issues with my Nas and looking for some thoughts. 1. The 323 gets recognised by Vista as a network device but...

Gigabit Network Help!
I have a gigabit NAS (D-link 323) that I have connected to a D-Link DGS-1005D gigabit switch. I then have my desktop connected to...

Synology DS-209+ review up!!
Looks real good. Now Netgear needs to play catchup and dump that old Infrant CPU for something more modern and powerful!! http://www.trustedreviews.com/networ...ion-DS-209-/p1

Slideshows

NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro Western Digital ShareSpace QNAP TS-509 Pro D-Link DNS-343 4-Bay Network Storage Enclosure Thecus N3200 RAID 5 NAS D-Link DIR-628 RangeBooster N Dual Band Router More

Win This!

Enter to Win!

You could win a Trendnet TEW-633GR Wireless N Gigabit Router and two TEW-621PC 300Mbps Wireless N-Draft PC Cards

Learn How!

 

Ldr:0.00159096717834, Rct:0.00563597679138, Sky:0.0073549747467, Tlink:0.123282909393, TopPG:0.123347043991, GQV:0.123467922211 seconds to load.