Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow NAS arrow NAS Reviews arrow Head to Head: Tritton's ASAP vs. ioGEAR's BOSS
Head to Head: Tritton's ASAP vs. ioGEAR's BOSS Print E-mail
Tim Higgins   
March 02, 2004

Introduction

Tritton Advanced Server Appliance with WebServer

Tritton Advanced Server Appliance with WebServer
Summary SPI-based router with IPsec and PPTP VPN endpoints and 120GB NAS. Also supports Web and FTP serving.
Update 4/14/2004 - Corrected NAS throughput result observations (again).

3/5/2004 - New firmware released by ioGEAR and Tritton. ASAP has new packaging. Corrected NAS throughput observations. Other miscellaneous changes.

Pros • Fast routing speed
• Supports two WAN IP addresses (Multi-NAT)
• Priced comparably to separate solutions
Cons • File sharing is exposed to WAN
• No DMZ
• No port range forwarding
• Limited file sharing privilege control
• Admin requires Internet Explorer

In their search for ways to differentiate themselves (and improve their miserably thin margins), networking product manufacturers are once again venturing into bundling network storage capability into their routing offerings. This idea of a combination router / file server isn't new, given that SMC and Linksys both fielded very similar products (OEM'd from Sercomm) back in 2001.

But if I remember correctly, the first-generation product - I tested SMC's SMC7208SBR Broadband Storage Server - was expensive, insecure, large, noisy and didn't really take off. U.S. Robotics' USR8200 Secure Storage Router Pro recently attempted to re-establish the router / storage combo category but requires you to bring your own storage - in the form of a USB2.0 hard drive.

Tritton's All in One Server Appliance (ASAP) and ioGEAR's Broadband Office Storage Server (BOSS) represent the latest incarnation of this product category, which now has the intended-to-be-less-scary "appliance" moniker. Unfortunately, though drive sizes have increased from 20GB to 120GB over three years, little else seems to have changed...



Tags: Iogear, NAS, router, Tritton,

Related Articles:

U.S. Robotics USR-8200 Secure Storage Router Pro reviewed
SMC Barricade Plus Cable/DSL Broadband router Review
XIMETA NetDisk Office reviewed
Linksys BEFVP41 EtherFast Cable/DSL VPN Router
How To: Getting VPN to work through NAT firewalls
 

Most Read

 
 

Slideshows

Western Digital My Book World Edition II (white bar) Buffalo TeraStation III Linksys WET610N Wireless-N Ethernet Bridge with Dual-Band NETGEAR ReadyNAS Vault Buffalo Linkstation Pro XHL LaCie Network Space More

Over At The Forums

NAS, Gigabit, TCP window size
Hi All, This could be a very stupid question...but... When looking to achieve max transfer speeds to a NAS, can the TCP window size of the *sending*...

Are STBC mandatory for 802.11n?
STBC for those who don't know are "Space Time Block Code" the feature of 802.11n that is supposed to extend the range to infinity and...

Definitely clueless..Please help!
Hey there. First let me tell you that I am really NOT technically savvy. I mean I can follow instructions (I was able to connect...

good laptop card to use w/WZR-HP-G300NH?
Going to order a Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH wireless router. Was looking for advice on a laptop card (32 bit cardbus card) for my gf's laptop (Inspiron...

Best way to sync NASs directly (not through computers)
I just finished reading Kevin's "How To Back Up Offsite for Free with rsync" article and it was pretty useful *but* it dealt with doing...

Go Shopping with PriceGrabber

Get Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner once a day

 
 

Ldr:0.00162506103516, Rct:0.00560903549194, Sky:0.00692701339722, Tlink:0.0849640369415, TopPG:0.0850281715393, GQV:0.0851621627808 seconds to load.