Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow Wireless arrow Wireless Reviews arrow Head to Head: ASUS WL-530g vs. Linksys WRT54GC Mini Wireless Routers
Head to Head: ASUS WL-530g vs. Linksys WRT54GC Mini Wireless Routers Print E-mail
Jim Hubbard   
May 12, 2005

Wireless Performance

OK, so how do these things perform? First of all, I need to point out an issue that I had with the ASUS product. One day while I was gone for a few hours, we had a power failure. I'm not sure how long it lasted, but when I got home I had no Internet access. I knew it had been working fine before I left because I had just downloaded a 600+MB CD image. I tried lots of things to get the connection back up, including resetting to defaults and even flashing the firmware, but nothing worked. All I got was this error page:

ASUS Disconnected

Figure 21: ASUS Disconnected
(click image to enlarge)

I connected my own firewall system and it worked fine. I connected the WRT54GC and it connected fine too. I finally figured out that the WL-530g was having a problem with DNS. The router was actually connecting OK, and getting an IP address from my provider, but it couldn't figure out the correct nameserver address. Thankfully, that address has been seared into my brain over the years, so I unchecked the "Get DNS Server Automatically" option and entered the correct IP addresses. Once that was done it connected OK, so I set everything back to auto and it reconnected like it should. Strange.

Now how about some wireless speed and range results? For two products that are so much alike, I expected performance to be close too, but that was not entirely the case. I performed all the throughput testing using 3 computers:

Mercury: Compaq Presario S5400NX with a P4 2.6Ghz processor and 504MB of memory

Zombie: Dell XPS D333 with a PII 333Mhz processor and 256MB of memory

Nomad: Dell Inspiron 1000 laptop with Celeron 2.2Ghz processor, 224MB of memory and a Dell Truemobile 1300 wireless card.

Tests were performed with all computers running Mandrake Linux version 10.1 and using the iperf utility set at the default 16.0 kByte TCP window size. All results are an average of at least 3 tests. I placed each product in my computer "dungeon", which is a spare bedroom upstairs in my two-story wood-frame construction home with all sorts of things like monitors, TV sets and fluorescent lights that should be bad news for wireless connectivity. 

Location Distance Linksys WRT54GC Throughput ASUS WL-530g Throughput
Dungeon Sitting right beside the product 23.71 Mbits/sec 23.52 Mbits/sec
Hallway About 10 feet away with a clear line of sight 23.45 Mbits/sec 23.29 Mbits/sec
Bedroom About 10 feet away, through 1 interior wall 16.27 Mbits/sec 23.42 Mbits/sec
Dining Room About 15 feet away, through 1 interior wall and a wood frame floor 12.08 Mbits/sec 20.01 Mbits/sec
Living Room About 15 feet away, through 2 interior walls and a wood frame floor 6.57 Mbits/sec 13.92 Mbits/sec
Bottom of Stairs About 20 feet away through 1 interior wall and down a flight of steps 20.64 Mbits/sec 16.76 Mbits/sec
Den About 20 feet away, through 4 interior walls and a wood frame floor 23.66 Mbits/sec 6.26 Mbits/sec
Garage About 35 feet away, through 2 interior walls, 1 exterior wall, and a floor 4.17 Mbits/sec 2.63 Mbits/sec

Table 1: Wireless Test Results

Note: All wireless tests are from Nomad to Mercury, i.e. uplink.

Table 1 shows that both products provided respectable connection speeds from almost anywhere in the house, and even some from the garage. But the products behaved differently, probably due to their different antenna configurations. Test results from the Garage had the widest variation, probably because it's on the fringe of the coverage area.

In their default configuations, I'd call the products different, but about equal in their speed vs. range performance. I suspect that adding even a simple 2dBi external antenna to the GC, however, might improve its performance beyond the 530g's since using two (diversity) antennas generally yields performance better than using only a single antenna.



Tags: ASUS, Linksys, router, WL-530g, WRT54GC,

Related Articles:

ASUS Adds Draft 11n Gigabit Router
Linksys Wireless-G w/ 2 Phone Ports Broadband Router
ZyXEL ZyAIR G-2000 Plus 802.11g Wireless 4-port Router
ASUS WL-330 Pocket Wireless Access Point reviewed
QuickView: ASUS WL-330G 54Mbps Pocket Access Point
 

Most Read

 
 

Slideshows

Western Digital My Book World Edition II (white bar) Buffalo TeraStation III Linksys WET610N Wireless-N Ethernet Bridge with Dual-Band NETGEAR ReadyNAS Vault Buffalo Linkstation Pro XHL LaCie Network Space More

Over At The Forums

Are STBC mandatory for 802.11n?
STBC for those who don't know are "Space Time Block Code" the feature of 802.11n that is supposed to extend the range to infinity and...

Definitely clueless..Please help!
Hey there. First let me tell you that I am really NOT technically savvy. I mean I can follow instructions (I was able to connect...

good laptop card to use w/WZR-HP-G300NH?
Going to order a Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH wireless router. Was looking for advice on a laptop card (32 bit cardbus card) for my gf's laptop (Inspiron...

Best way to sync NASs directly (not through computers)
I just finished reading Kevin's "How To Back Up Offsite for Free with rsync" article and it was pretty useful *but* it dealt with doing...

Wirless NIC and Vista64.
I've lately noticed frequent packet loss and connection drop from my desktop in my usual doings (gaming & web browsing). I thought this connection was...

Go Shopping with PriceGrabber

Get Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner once a day

 
 

Ldr:0.00166201591492, Rct:0.0055410861969, Sky:0.00683903694153, Tlink:0.240835189819, TopPG:0.240906000137, GQV:0.241067171097 seconds to load.