Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow NAS arrow NAS Features arrow Smart SOHOs Don't Do RAID
Smart SOHOs Don't Do RAID Print E-mail
Tim Higgins   
June 12, 2007

Introduction

Just Say No to RAID

RAID (Redundant Array of Independent/Inexpensive Disks) technology is a great innovation in storage technology, allowing something that is fundamentally unreliable and slow—hard drives—to become faster and more robust. As with any technology, however, you should understand the tradeoffs and not blindly apply it to real or perceived problems. I had the opportunity recently to learn this first hand. The experience was such a "D'oh!" that I thought it worth passing on.

In concept, RAID 5 NASes provide a great way to get a large amount of storage while lowering the odds of data loss by disk crash. RAID 5 systems are more efficient than RAID 1 (mirrored) because you lose only the equivalent of one drive's capacity in an array of three or more drives. RAID 1 systems lose 100% of the capacity of the second drive.

However, as was made evident from my recent experience, RAID only provides insurance against drive failure. If some other part of your NAS system goes South, all of that wonderful RAID goodness won't make your data available.

What happened to me was the the controller board in my RAID 5 NAS went belly up. It could just as easily been the power supply, which I actually first thought was the culprit and wasted a week replacing. Or the main or power supply fans, whose failures should have caused a thermal shutdown.

The good news is that I use my NAS only for backup of my primary work machines. So the only thing I lost during the two weeks that the NAS was down was the comfort of knowing that my files were backed up every four hours.

But what I had been using the NAS as my primary file store? Or been burglarized? Or had a fire or unexpected flood? All of those wonderful RAID parity bits would have been useless because they were all part of the same box.

The fact is that most home, SOHO and smaller business users don't need the constant availability that RAID was designed for. While centralized databases supporting dozens of transactions per second do need to be able to stay up and running if a drive dies, less intensive uses can take a different approach to data security.



Tags: NAS, RAID,

Related Articles:

Slideshow - Buffalo LinkStation Live
New to the Charts: NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro
New to the Charts: Intel SS4200-E Entry Storage System
ZyXEL enters market with single and dual-drive NASes
Slideshow: Netgear ReadyNAS Duo
 

Most Read

 
 

Over At The Forums

Open Box 409 Pro safe to buy?
I've been doing my best to research the different NAS systems available and it seems QNAP is the way to go. I'd love to...

Router N
Im desperate. I have a rule that I'm looking in 3 sources to make opinion, but what if 3 sources say different word? I live...

need router for gaming and internet
ok so im finally fed up with my old netgear router, its slow, doesnt have good range and drops connection a lot. im using it...

looking for a good 200+ simultaneous connection dual-N router
I have been browsing the site reviews for several hours, but don't really see a wireless router that stands above the rest. Here are...

New firmware 2.1.0
see also http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=142&t=10052 i had already the beta's running with also iscsi. Many more features are there.

Slideshows

NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro Western Digital ShareSpace QNAP TS-509 Pro D-Link DNS-343 4-Bay Network Storage Enclosure Thecus N3200 RAID 5 NAS D-Link DIR-628 RangeBooster N Dual Band Router More

Win This!

Enter to Win!

You could win a Trendnet TEW-633GR Wireless N Gigabit Router and two TEW-621PC 300Mbps Wireless N-Draft PC Cards

Learn How!

 

Ldr:0.00185108184814, Rct:0.0407691001892, Sky:0.0446221828461, Tlink:0.364179134369, TopPG:0.364262104034, GQV:0.364430189133 seconds to load.