Wireless
Wireless Tutorial
How is WPS supposed to work? | How is WPS supposed to work? |
|
|
| Tim Higgins | |
| March 13, 2008 | |
![]() I don't seem to have any luck getting Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) to work in any of the products I've tested that allegedly support it. And since the Wi-Fi Alliance seems to have me on its "Do Not Talk To" list, I'm turning to our readers, who tend to be a pretty knowledgeable bunch, for wisdom. WPS is a wireless security setup protocol that the Alliance brokered as a way to get Buffalo, Intel, Atheros, Broadcom and Microsoft to stop working at cross-purposes. WPS combines elements of Broadcom's Secure Easy Setup, Buffalo's AOSS (AirStation One-Touch Secure System), Atheros' JumpStart, Intels Smart Wireless Technology and Microsoft's WCN (Windows Connect Now) into a single method for getting a wireless network securely set up quickly and easily. As with similar brokered initiatives such as WPA, WPS has taken way too long to get into actual products. But now that it is, I don't think it really works. I just, once again, tried a "matched set" of Wi-Fi Certified for Draft 2.0 802.11n router and card that supported WPS in both the router and client driver / utility. I started with the router and client in their "out-of-the-box" settings, which included no wireless security, but WPS enabled in the router. I got them associated and then pressed the WPS button on the router and in the client utility. After about 10 seconds, the client and router reported successful completion of the WPS session. But imagine my surprise when I found that the connection was still unsecured! I ran the test multiple times, sometimes starting the WPS session on the client first, other times the router first. But the result was always an unsecured connection. This isn't the first product I've found where a WPS session didn't automatically create a key and use it to set up a WPA2 secured (or the strongest security that both client and AP would support) connection. I had a similar experience with the Edimax BR-6504N, i.e. client and router supported WPS, session would complete, but security would not be set from an unsecured state. I also couldn't get WPS to work on a D-Link DGL-4500. And while Trendnet's TEW-633GR supported WPS, the client utility for its "matching" TEW-621PC card didn't. All of these products have Wi-Fi 802.11n Draft 2.0 Certification and all, except the Trendnet pair, carry WPS PIN and PBC Certifications. But my main question is, am I incorrect in my understanding that WPS is supposed to take a router and client card from an unsecured to a secured connection without having to choose a security mode in the router and enter a key? The Alliance's white paper states:
So far, I've yet to see this happen...and in products that have passed Wi-Fi certification that includes WPS. So, somebody out there help me, please. What am I missing? Comments (7)
![]() New comments have been disabled. Please use the Forums
Related Articles:Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) Need To KnowUpdate2: D-Link, Netgear, Linksys, others get Wi-Fi N Certification SMC shipping draft 11n trio New to the Charts: D-Link DIR-625 RangeBooster N Router Intel announces draft 11n chipset |
|
Don't send password in clear text upon registration
Vista / XP home workgroup setup?
IPCop Router
Navbar - forums links
WHS Power Pack 1 - Retest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
| Wireless Performance Charts: Linksys WRT110 |
| Router Performance Charts: Linksys WRT110 |
|
Social networking pictures come back to haunt drunk drivers Wife’s tearful YouTube rant earns her a divorce and eviction Sustainable Living: Ecobay Development |
Z-Wave Thermostats Buyer's Guide
HomeSeer Unveils Hybrid HomeTroller Home Automation Controller
Need an outdoor Z-Wave module that can withstand extreme temperatures? Ask the Expert