Router Charts

Router Charts

Router Ranker

Router Ranker

Router Chooser

Router Chooser

NAS Charts

NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

NAS Ranker

More Tools

More Tools

NAS Reviews

Introduction

I asked Synology to resubmit its top-of-the-line DS508 Disk Station for retesting with our new NAS testbed. I didn't think that the old test method was limiting the performance produced by the 508's Freescale MPC8543 and 512 MB of DDR2 RAM. But since it is Synology's current top-of-the-line machine and selling for over $1000, I wanted to enable readers to make an apples-to-apples comparison with other high-performance NASes that have been tested with the new process.

Synology sent the system with five Seagate ST3500320AS Barracuda 7200.11 500 GB drives installed (32 MB cache), hoping for a bit of performance boost over the WD800JD Caviar SE 80 GB (8 MB cache) drives supplied for the previous review and test. The new system had DSM 2.0-0732 firmware vs. the DSM 2.0-0598 on the previous test.

Tests were run with 100 Mbps, 1000 Mbps and 1000 Mbps w/ 4k jumbo frame LAN connections. The system was first set to factory defaults, which includes write cache enabled, then formatted first with all five drives configured in RAID 0, then RAID 5.

Figure 1, which compares RAID 0 and RAID 5 write benchmarks with 1000 Mbps and 1000 Mbps w/ 4k jumbo frame LAN connections. What is interesting here is that all points are below the Gigabit LAN's 125 MB/s maximum speed, i.e. cache effects have been minimized. You'll see the contrast with other NASes in a moment.

Write throughput for 32 MB to 4 GB file sizes and 1000 Mbps LAN averaged 40.8 MB/s for RAID 0 and 31.2 MB/s for RAID 5, while reads averaged 51.9 MB/s for RAID 0 and 48.3 MB/s for RAID 5. Using 4k jumbo frames provided a bit of RAID 0 performance boost, but more with RAID 5.

Synology DS508 Write benchmark comparison

Figure 1: Synology DS508 Write benchmark comparison

Read results bounce around (amplified by the reduced scale) but average 51.9 MB/s for RAID 0 and 48.3 MB/s for RAID 5. Using 4k jumbo frames yields a slight RAID 0 improvement to an average 52.1 MB/s for the 32 MB to 4 GB "large" file size group and 51.8 MB/s for RAID 5.

Synology DS508 Read benchmark comparison

Figure 2: Synology DS508 Read benchmark comparison

Competitively, the DS508's lack of cache boost at the smaller filesizes puts it at a disadvantage. Figure 3 compares the DS508, new HP MediaSmart EX487, Thecus M3800 Stream Box and retested NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro write performance with a gigabit LAN connection and includes the results from the DS508's old testbed run.

I have included the table of throughput values, since the HP's extremely high cached performance at smaller file sizes compresses the plot at the higher file sizes. The cache boost that the DS508 got in the previous test at the 32 MB file size is gone and performance is very similar otherwise. The DS508 actually turns in better results than the Thecus M3800 from 128 MB file size on up, even though it ranks (right) below it in the average chart.

Synology DS508 competitive write comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

Figure 3: Synology DS508 competitive write comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

The read comparison in Figure 4 shows that the retested DS508's throughput stays nice and steady vs. the first test's falloff after 256 MB file size. You can also see that the DS508 is a bit slower than the Thecus M3800 from 256 MB file size on up.

Synology DS508 competitive read comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

Figure 4: Synology DS508 competitive read comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

More NAS

Featured Sponsors

Top Performing Routers

AC3200
AC2350
AC1900
AC1750
AC1200

Top Performing NASes

NoRAID
RAID1
RAID5

Over In The Forums

Greetings All, On my RT-AC87U setup as a 2nd router and I have setup a static route so I can access the network behind the AC87. Works great. But I...
Greetings, I have access to a wireless net in an apartment complex. I want to use a router to connect to this wireless network (192.), and allow me ...
Hi All, Can anyone suggest what I am doing wrong? I have setup port forwarding to the device I need to respond to certain ports (apache on port 80/44...
Seeing as the traffic monitor doesn't work, (will it ever?!?!?) could anyone recommend a downloadable whole network monitor that could be used in the ...
Is there any limit to hard drives formatted to HFS+? Asus just state HFS+ is supported in their literature, not specifying a limit. Looking at a 3TB ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3