Router Charts

Router Charts

Router Ranker

Router Ranker

Router Chooser

Router Chooser

NAS Charts

NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

NAS Ranker

More Tools

More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Retest

Introduction

Shortly after we posted the Archer C9 review, TP-LINK let us know our results didn't match what they found with testing in their own Octoscope-based test setup. The culprit was that the C9's stand-up format positioned a good portion of the router's antennas above our test chamber antennas, reducing received signal. This is clearly seen in the test setup photo below.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

A quick retest with the router laid down so that all parts of its antennas were lower did in fact show significant improvement.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

So we went back and reran wireless tests for all stand-up format routers to ensure we were not unfairly penalizing them.

The firmwares and routers in this retest are:

  • ASUS RT-AC68U: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • ASUS RT-AC68P: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • Buffalo WXR-1900DHP: 2.3.0
  • Linksys EA9200: Ver.1.1.5 (Build 164615)
  • TP-LINK Archer C8: 3.16.28 Build 20141023
  • TP-LINK Archer C9: 3.15.27 Build 20141015

The retest improved 5 GHz performance in most cases. But 2.4 GHz performance was either essentially the same or slightly degraded.

The affected routers fall into AC1750, AC1900 and AC3200 classes. So that's how we'll compare before and after.

AC1750

TP-LINK's Archer C8 definitely benefited from the retest, moving from #3 to #1 rank among AC1750 class routers tested with the current process.

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

The C8's performance summary shows strong 5 GHz performance helped boost its ranking.

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

This is clearly seen comparing 5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation plots of the top four ranked routers. Not only does the C8's overall throughput curve move higher, but it remains connected out to 39 dB of attenuation.

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz uplink throughput isn't as dramatic, but improves mostly with lower attenuation levels (stronger signals). Check the gallery below for a full set of before and after plots.

More Wireless

Featured Sponsors



Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Top Performing Routers

AC3200
AC2600
AC1900
AC1750
AC1200

Top Performing NASes

NoRAID
RAID1
RAID5

Over In The Forums

Simple question, which routers allow connecting USB hubs to connect multiple *powered* USB hard drives? And I want to make it clear, I don't want a N...
As part of a round of beefing up the security of my network I decided to set up ipset/iptables to filter traffic from the darkest corners of the inter...
I am using Asus AC66u with firmware 380.59, and trying to use SNMP for cacti on it but cacti doesn't recognize it. I have spare raspberry PI, so i ins...
I've been running merlin firmware in ac56u model which I got in norway, but currently using in India. So unfortunately warranty cannot be claimed now...
I noticed that you can rename the client names when you go to network map -> view clients. I was just wondering if this change will retain when upgrad...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3