Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Retest


Shortly after we posted the Archer C9 review, TP-LINK let us know our results didn't match what they found with testing in their own Octoscope-based test setup. The culprit was that the C9's stand-up format positioned a good portion of the router's antennas above our test chamber antennas, reducing received signal. This is clearly seen in the test setup photo below.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

A quick retest with the router laid down so that all parts of its antennas were lower did in fact show significant improvement.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

So we went back and reran wireless tests for all stand-up format routers to ensure we were not unfairly penalizing them.

The firmwares and routers in this retest are:

  • ASUS RT-AC68U:
  • ASUS RT-AC68P:
  • Buffalo WXR-1900DHP: 2.3.0
  • Linksys EA9200: Ver.1.1.5 (Build 164615)
  • TP-LINK Archer C8: 3.16.28 Build 20141023
  • TP-LINK Archer C9: 3.15.27 Build 20141015

The retest improved 5 GHz performance in most cases. But 2.4 GHz performance was either essentially the same or slightly degraded.

The affected routers fall into AC1750, AC1900 and AC3200 classes. So that's how we'll compare before and after.


TP-LINK's Archer C8 definitely benefited from the retest, moving from #3 to #1 rank among AC1750 class routers tested with the current process.

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

The C8's performance summary shows strong 5 GHz performance helped boost its ranking.

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

This is clearly seen comparing 5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation plots of the top four ranked routers. Not only does the C8's overall throughput curve move higher, but it remains connected out to 39 dB of attenuation.

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz uplink throughput isn't as dramatic, but improves mostly with lower attenuation levels (stronger signals). Check the gallery below for a full set of before and after plots.

More Wireless

Featured Sponsors

Top Ranked Routers




Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Win This!


You could win a ZyXEL NAS326 2-Bay Personal Cloud Storage

Learn How!

Over In The Forums

I've got my N66 as a wireless repeater from my AC68.I've got multiple wireless ip cameras connected to the AC68, all cameras have static ip's given by...
Hello. After today reboot the router, not mounted hard disk WD 3TB. The disk is connected without problems for 2 years and the first time I have this ...
View attachment 7517 ​ Ignition Design Labs today announced its Portal router can now be ordered on Amazon.Portal is a QCA-based AC2350 / 2400 MU-MI...
just found out that the new netgear router X10 can host a full functional plex server OMG!!i already tried plex on my RT-AC 87u and that was a success...
Without throwing up errors?If it can but throws errors would the following suppress them:1) Use telnet or go to

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3