Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Features

GlobespanVirata 11g vs. Atheros 11g

My previous tests with Broadcom 11g clients seemed to validate Broadcom's assertions that Super-G was a "bad neighbor" technology. But something didn't sit right with me.

For Atheros to ship technology that was by design virtually guaranteed to interfere with an installed base of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of products, would be either incredibly stupid, arrogant, or both. Since my experience with Atheros tells me that the people there are neither, I felt something else was going on.

Also bothering me was the fact that during my initial look at the NETGEAR WG511T and WGT624, I ran some quick WLAN vs WLAN tests using an 802.11b client, and didn't see any "bad neighbor" effects.

Streaming

So I decided to repeat my tests, this time using 11g equipment based on GlobespanVirata's PRISM chipset. Drawing from the products I had on hand, I chose NETGEAR's WG121 11g / USB2.0 adapter and WG602 access point and the following setup:

  • Atheros-based test pair set to "normal" 802.11g, channel 6
  • GlobespanVirata-based 11g test pair on channel 11
  • 2.048Mbps, UDP NetMtgv.scr running on both WLANs
  • 10 feet maximum between WLANs (both APs and STAs [clients])
  • GlobespanVirata-based WLAN started first, followed by Atheros-based WLAN 10 seconds later.
  • Data sent from STA to AP

Figures 1 and 2 show throughput and lost data plots, with the results showing no measurable interaction between the two wireless LANs. Note that the glitch in the throughput plot - according to Broadcom - is due to a scan done by WinXP's Zero Configuration utility.

Although interesting, these results weren't that surprising, since the same test done with a Broadcom-based client also showed little interaction between WLANs.

Throughput for Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft

Figure 1: Throughput for Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Lost Data % for Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft
Figure 2: Lost Data % for Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g - 2Mbps streams - 10ft

(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Maximum Throughput

So I next moved on to run maximum throughput tests on both 11g WLANs, using this setup:

  • Atheros-based test pair set to "normal" 802.11g, channel 6
  • GlobespanVirata-based 11g test pair on channel 11
  • Throughput.scr running on both WLANs. TCP protocol, 200,000 Byte file size, no delay between sends, unlimited data rate
  • 10 feet maximum between WLANs (both APs and STAs)
  • GlobespanVirata-based WLAN started first, followed by Atheros-based WLAN 10 seconds later.
  • Data sent from STA to AP

Again, results in Figures 3 and 4 were similar to the Broadcom-client tests with noticeable interference between the WLANS at 10 feet, but gone by 30 feet. (I didn't run 50 foot tests, since I knew they wouldn't provide additional insight.

Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g throughput - 10ft
Figure 3: Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g throughput - 10ft

(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g throughput - 30ft
Figure 4: Atheros 11g vs GlobespanVirata 11g throughput - 30ft

(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Mixed Streaming and Throughput

I wrapped up this round of tests with a mixed streaming / throughput run, set up as:

  • Atheros-based test pair set to "normal" 802.11g, channel 6
  • GlobespanVirata-based 11g test pair on channel 11
  • Throughput.scr running on the Atheros-based WLAN. TCP protocol, 200,000 Byte file size, no delay between sends, unlimited data rate
  • 2.048Mbps, UDP NetMtgv.scr running on GlobespanVirata-based WLAN
  • 10 feet maximum between WLANs (both APs and STAs)
  • GlobespanVirata-based WLAN started first, followed by Atheros-based WLAN 10 seconds later.
  • Data sent from STA to AP

Once again, not a lot of insight gained, since the results were similar to my previous tests. Time to move on to Super-G testing.

Throughput for GlobespanVirata 11g 2Mbps stream vs Atheros 11g throughput - 10ft

Figure 5: Throughput for GlobespanVirata 11g 2Mbps stream vs Atheros 11g throughput - 10ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Lost Data % for GlobespanVirata 11g 2Mbps stream vs Atheros 11g throughput - 10ft

Figure 6: Lost Data % for GlobespanVirata 11g 2Mbps stream vs Atheros 11g throughput - 10ft
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

One of the reasons I just bought an AC68U was because I wanted the Traffic Analyzer.Apparently enabling this requires "that your information will be c...
So, I currently have 2 routers. One is a Linksys and the other is an ASUS, I don't think models really make a difference in the scenario. Basically, I...
Im sure this question has been asked before but I am trying to connect my AC3200 to a Meraki MX64. MX64 supports L2TP with PSK. Asus Merlin doesnt hav...
Hey allSo i have two netgear switch models.I have two nighthawk s8000 and two netgear GS 108's. Both 8 ports. My cable is 1 gigabit and and my system ...
When I click on "guest Network" I get this screen instead of the normal setup screen. Any ideas? total noob here...thanks

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3