Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Features

The Alliance said it is making "only small optional additions" to its Draft 2.0 802.11n Certification test suite to create the program for the released standard. It plans to start testing in "late September", to coincide with 11n's assumed ratification.

The confusing, and potentially troublesome, part of the Alliance's plan, however, is that products approved under the Draft 2.0 802.11n Certification process will be allowed to "use the approved 802.11n logo without retesting". The Alliance said it is allowing this "because all Wi-Fi CERTIFIED draft 2.0 products meet the core requirements of - and interoperate with - the updated program".

But the final 11n Certification suite will also test for compliance with four "optional" features included in the released standard (packet aggregation, coexistence, three spatial streams and space-time block coding). So once the new test plan kicks in, products with different capabilities will all carry the same Certification mark. The means that consumers will need to dig into product specifications to look for evidence of the optional features, assuming that manufacturers provide the necessary details.

The optional features all affect products' maximum throughput, which is a key selection criteria for most consumers. In particular, the three spatial stream "option", really creates a new class of products, those capable of 450 Mbps maximum link rates. The Alliance's announcement also makes no mention of single-stream (150 Mbps maximum link rate) products, some of which are not certifiable under current Alliance policy.

In the end, today's announcement is a good thing for Wi-Fi product manufacturers, who will be able to simply remove the "draft" from their Certification marks come later this year. But it once again places an undue burden on consumers to navigate through increasingly complex product specifications to try to figure out why their "high throughput" wireless products, aren't.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

A bit of context. I live in the desert of Arizona in the US. I have a ranch-style house, so it is long when measured end-to-end. It has a loft mid-hou...
In recent weeks I’m having issues with my ISP modem (virgin media SH3) dropping and out and failing to give my ASUS router a DHCP address. I can fix t...
According to this documentation https://www.asus.com/us/support/FAQ/1035140/AIMesh works only if they are connected to each other? (WAN port to LAN)I ...
Hello.My setup consists of a Vigor 130 (bridged mode) and the RT-AC86U, working with Sky Fibre (UK). However is there away without re-routing cables, ...
Early this morning I did some speed tests with my Netgear RAX80 (FW 1.0.1.70_), iPhone 11 Pro Max (AX client), and Pixel 3 (AC client). I chose early ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3