Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Mesh Charts

Click for Mesh Charts

Performance - File Copy

Vista SP1 filecopy results (Figure 10) for RAID 5 write show the N5500 in third place, behind the N7700 with 79.7 MB/s average write speed.

Vista SP1 File Copy - RAID 5 write

Figure 10: Vista SP1 File Copy - RAID 5 write

Things are more competitive for RAID 5 read, however, since the 5500's 80.5 MB/s (Figure 11), rates only 7th place. But the N5500 beat the N7700 this time.

Vista SP1 File Copy - RAID 5 read

Figure 11: Vista SP1 File Copy - RAID 5 read

For the competitive comparison, I chose two five-drive NASes, the QNAP TS-509 Pro and Synology DS508, plus the Thecus N5200 Pro for previous-generation comparison.

Figure 12 shows the QNAP TS-509 Pro most evenly matched to the 5500, which is probably not that surprising given that the QNAP uses an Intel Celeron M @ 1.6 GHz vs. the 5500's 1.86 GHz Celeron M (and both have 1 GB of RAM).

Competitive write comparison  - RAID 5, 1000 Mbps LAN

Figure 12: Competitive write comparison - RAID 5, 1000 Mbps LAN

Figure 13 compares the RAID 5 read performance, which has more of a spread. The QNAP comes out on top this time, followed by the 5500. But the 5500's speed falls off with larger file sizes, touching the Synology DS508 curve at the 2 GB file size.

Competitive read comparison  - RAID 5, 1000 Mbps LAN

Figure 13: Competitive read comparison - RAID 5, 1000 Mbps LAN

Use the NAS Charts to further explore performance.


I ran a quick check of the 5500's performance as an attached USB drive and as an iSCSI target. I allocated around 7 GB of space on a RAID 10 array for USB, then for iSCSI. Each time, the volume was quick formatted in NTFS and tested using the standard Vista SP1 filecopy test that copies a 4.35 GB ripped DVD test folder.

USB performance was disappointing, averaging only 11.75 MB/s for write and 13.6 MB/s for read.

iSCSI target performance was much better, averaging 80.9 MB/s for write and 82 MB/s for read.

Closing Thoughts

I think that the 5500 will probably end the N5200 Pro's long reign as Thecus' go-to entry-level "Enterprise" NAS. But with an MSRP of $869 and only one vendor stocking it at $899, it doesn't seem that good a deal vs. the N7700, which can be picked up for as low as $849 as I write this. I think Thecus may need to tweak the pricing a bit...and I don't mean by raising the N7700!

The new GUI is definitely a step in the right direction, but there is still plenty more work to do to make it more appealing and user-friendly. Online help would definitely be a good addition. And the feature set needs completing, especially the backup features.

But if you've been a N5200 Pro fan (or even if you haven't) and looking to move up to a faster 5 bay NAS, the N5500 is worth a look, especially if you need multi-volume flexibility.

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2