Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

LAN & WAN Reviews

Wireless Performance

NOTE!NOTES:
"Signal Quality" readings were not available
WiFiSec mode enabled and WEP disabled
Testing was done with an ORiNOCO 802.11b Gold client card in a WinXP Home Dell Inspiron 4100 laptop

I started out trying to use a NETGEAR WAG511 a/b/g card [reviewed here] for my testing, since it has a good 11b radio and I wanted to give the TZW a fair shot at turning in good performance marks. However, after futzing around with it and other draft-11g based cards for a few hours I found that I couldn't get any card to go faster than about 1Mbps or so. So I gave up and decided to use an ORiNOCO 802.11g Gold card instead. I later read the following in the release notes for version 1.0.0.1 of the TZW's firmware:

Some wireless cards, notably Netgear and Linksys 54G cards, have demonstrated compatibility issues when connecting to other manufacturer's devices. Compatibility issues are further complicated by the use of WEP, or by increasing the beaconing interval beyond its default value. It is strongly recommended that you upgrade to the latest firmware and device drivers available from your wireless client card's manufacturer, particularly if you are using Netgear or Linksys 54G equipment.

I asked Sonicwall how they were sure that the problem lay with the draft-11g cards and not with the TZW's radio and basically got a "draft-11g new and unstable, PRISM stable and mature" (I'm paraphrasing) response. But no matter what the cause, I'd have to say that I agree with Sonicwall's warning and advise not planning on using any 802.11g cards with the TZW until after 11g is ratified and you update your card's firmware with released 11g code!

With my test client chosen, I then decided to do my four location throughput test in the WiFiSec mode and without WEP enabled, since I figured most users would be running in that mode. Figure 11 shows the results.

Sonicwall SOHO TZW: Four condition throughput test

Figure 11: Four Condition Throughput test - WiFiSec mode
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

As you can see, the TZW had consistent throughput in all of my test locations, but with 3Mbps average throughput - significantly lower than the best case throughput of good 802.11b products.

I attribute the consistency to the dual 5dBi antennas and 200mW radio which together produce a stronger signal than the 2.2dBi dipoles and 30mW radio that come with many consumer APs.

The lower throughput, however, came from the use of WiFiSec. Since the TZW has two potential throughput stealers in its WEP and WiFiSec encryption options, I ran some tests to quantify the effects of each.

Sonicwall SOHO TZW: Security option throughput comparison

Figure 12: Security option throughput comparison
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Figure 12 shows four Chariot "Condition 1" (close range) runs with:

  • neither WiFiSec nor WEP enabled
  • WiFiSec only enabled
  • WEP 128 only enabled
  • WiFiSec and WEP 128 both enabled

You can see that the best case wireless throughput is around 4.5Mbps, with WEP taking an almost 20% bite and knocking throughput down to about 3.7Mbps. Choosing the more secure WiFiSec, however, lowers throughput by about 1/3 (33%). Fortunately, the effects of WEP and WiFiSec aren't additive, since the last run made with both enabled shows the same 33% reduction as with WiFiSec alone.

I found this result surprising, especially considering that my Ethernet-based VPN testing showed about 7Mbps available through a wired tunnel. But there are apparently other factors that come into play with the wireless WiFiSec that result in the reduction that I measured.

So although I give the TZW excellent remarks on throughput vs. range performance, I have to say I'm disappointed with the significant WiFiSec throughput hit. 802.11b's best-case 5Mbps-or-so throughput is marginal enough for busy wireless LANs, and business users may find the lowered WiFiSec bandwidth insufficient for their needs.

802.11b Wireless Performance Test Results

Test Conditions


- WEP encryption: DISABLED
- Tx Rate: Automatic
- Power Save: Disabled
- Test Partner: ORiNOCO 802.11b Gold

Firmware/Driver Versions

AP f/w:
1.0.0.1
Wireless client driver:
7.42.0.300 (WinXP)
Wireless client f/w:
No Info

Test Description Signal Quality (%) Transfer Rate (Mbps) Response Time (msec) UDP stream
Throughput (kbps) Lost data (%)
Client to AP - Condition 1 0 3
[No WEP]
2.9
[w/ WEP]
5 (avg)
6 (max)
404 19
Client to AP - Condition 2 0 3 5 (avg)
6 (max)
404 19
Client to AP - Condition 3 0 3 5 (avg)
6 (max)
402 19
Client to AP - Condition 4 0 3 5 (avg)
6 (max)
403 19
See details of how we test.

More LAN & WAN

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

For reasons not important here, I have both Xfinity and FiOS connetions active at my house. (The FiOS will be the only permanent one, Xfinity goes awa...
When setting up multiple VPN clients, it is my understanding that Client 1 has the highest priority, then Client 2, and so on. Does this mean that Cli...
Whenever I try to update/upgrade opkg I'm getting the following response:Code: admin@RT-AC68U-08B0:/usr/lib# opkg updateDownloading http://bin.entwar...
My post relates to an issue with ASUS AiMesh and 2.4GHz clients.I have configured a Blue Cave as the AiMesh router and 2x RT-AC68U's as AiMesh nodes. ...
Several times per day my AC-58U refuses to work on the 5GHz band.Looking at the system log I can see the following repeating 50-100 times:Jul 14 12:59...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3