Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Features

NAS Ranker Changes

Users told us that our method of ranking NASes by processor class made it difficult to use the tool. It also isn't the way most people shop for NASes. So we've made some changes.

We have removed processor class from the ranking algorithm. So all NASes are now ranked based purely on performance. This means NASes with more powerful processors are at the top and lesser powered products rank lower. We haven't changed any of the benchmarks that go into the ranking. They're all the same as described in the original NAS Ranker introduction.

This makes for one big pile, however, so we have tweaked the NAS Ranker view so that you can filter the ranking results by number of drives and also by processor class.

Here's the new NAS Ranker view with filters at their defaults.

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives

New NAS Ranker Default View

And the view filtered to show only two-bay products.

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives

And now filtered for two bays and single core SoC processors.

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives, single core SoC

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives, single core SoC

Since price is important, we have added the ability to sort any rank view by Price. Here's the same filtered view sorted by Low to High Price. You just click the [Sort By PRICE High To Low] link to sort the other way.

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives, single core SoC

New NAS Ranker - Filtered- 2 drives, single core SoC

NAS Chart Changes

The NAS Ranker changes make it more similar to the way the NAS Charts have worked, which by default show all products sorted by high-to-low performance in the selected benchmark as shown below.

New NAS Chart - default view

New NAS Chart - default view

The same Class and Drive filters are still there along with Company and Bar color. But you can now sort the view by Class and Price ($$) in addition to performance (Throughput). Just click on the Class:Rank or $$ column titles as desired.

Here's the unfiltered default view below, sorted by low to high price. As you might expect, the single-core SoC products are at the top of the sort. Of course, you can also apply any of the filters and sort those views, too.

New NAS Chart - Price sort low to high

New NAS Chart - Price sort low to high

These new chart sort options are available in the Router, Wireless and Powerline Charts, too.

We hope you like the changes. Be sure to let us know what you think either via the Forums or just by dropping us a line.

Go check out the improved NAS Ranker now!

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi!I recently bought used RT-N16 with intention to replace firmware with OpenWRT to later get it running in my dorm, which has 802.1x eduroam authenti...
say, what are people using here ?? Default message log levelLog only messages more urgent thanmy log was full of dhcp, and everything else.what would ...
So, my Asus RT-AC1300UHP has been behaving weirdly lately. This has been happening for the last two days. Suddenly, my connected mobile phones will sh...
I have an NFS mount on a router running 380.70 with no issues - NFS is running by default. Further info below (tried to edit/delete this post for chan...
I see a difference here in my bridge 192.168.1.15, which in connected to an access point 192.168.1.11Why the difference in transmission rates?View att...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3