Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS How To

Performance - Read

I ran the iozone test on multiple configurations, so you'll need to use the info in Tables 2 and 3 to decipher the abbreviations used in the plots below. 

Abbreviation Translation
1G Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
Ubuntu Ubuntu 6.06 Desktop
CC ClarkConnect 3.2 Home Operating System
FreeNAS FreeNAS .671 used
XPP Windows XP Pro Operating System Used
S22 Sempron 2200+ CPU on ECS Motherboard
D16 Duron 1.6 GHz Processor on ASRock Motherboard
RAID5 LSI Logic Megaraid i4 Card Used
NoRAID A single 300 Gigabyte Maxtor ATA drive Used.
Table 2: Performance Chart Legend Abbreviations
Abbreviation Translation
Terastation noraid 1G The Terastation NAS System with Gigabit Ethernet Adapter
100M Ethernet This line shows the theoretical throughput of 100 Megabit Ethernet
Ubuntu_1G_RAID5_S22 Ubuntu 6.06 DT on RAID5 Hardware with GB Ethernet 2200+ Sempron
FreeNAS_1G_RAID5_S22 FreeNAS on RAID5 Hardware with GB Ethernet and 2200+ Sempron
Ubuntu_1G_NoRAID S22 Ubuntu 6.06 DT with GB Ethernet and 2200+ Sempron
CC_1G_NoRAID_S22 ClarkConnect 3.2 Home on GB Ethernet and 2200+ Sempron
XPP_1G_NoRAID_D16 Windows XP Pro with GB Ethernet on a Duron 1.6 GHz
Ubuntu_1G_NoRAID_D16 Ubuntu 6.06 DT with GB Ethernet on a Duron 1.6 GHz
CC_1G_NoRAID_D16 ClarkConnect with GB Ethernet on Duron 1.6 GHz
Table 3: Performance Chart Legend

If you are interested in whether the DIY NAS is as fast as entry-level commercial systems, Figures 16 (for Read performance) and 19 (for Write performance) pool the data from my last review and this one. From the graphs and tables the following seems fair to conclude:

• Eliminating RAID5 hardware on a given computer system speeds up your read performance dramatically. At least with the old LSI MegaRAID i4 card, hardware is not an equalizer.

• Eliminating RAID5 hardware will allow you to double file size one more time before poor read performance sets in. The dark blue line that drops between 131072 and 262144 file sizes (128MB and 256MB) represents a drop in performance for the Ubuntu.

• Windows XP Pro's read performance is not significantly different than Ubuntu 6.06 Desktop's peformance with a partial exception of very large data files (1 GB).

All System Read Performance Comparison

Figure 16: All System Read Performance Comparison (click image to enlarge)

Figure 16 is a lot of information to digest, so I've dropped all but the Ubuntu and TeraStation lines in Figure 17. In this figure we have displayed three conditions under which we tested Ubuntu 6.06 Desktop:

  • With a Sempron 2200+ and Hardware RAID (blue line)
  • With Sempron 2200+ and without RAID(top red line)
  • With Duron 1.6 GHz and without RAID (green/blue dashed line)

Ubuntu Read Performance Comparison

Figure 17: Ubuntu Read Performance Comparison (click image to enlarge)

The Megaraid i4 card seemed to help the system perform very well at 128 MB file size and below. But, on larger file sizes, the non-RAID configurations were better. The difference between the Sempron 2200+ and the Duron 1.6 GHz can be seen by looking at the difference between the red and green/blue dashed lines. On the faster CPU, hardware RAID was never faster or as fast as not using RAID. I found this to be surprising. I've always thought (hoped) that the hardware cards for RAID were equalizers for the RAID overhead. Not so, particularly for large (i.e., 500 MB and larger) file sizes.

Figure 18 displays the ClarkConnect read performance using AMD Sempron and Duron processors and shows that neither of the ClarkConnect configurations were as fast as the slowest Ubuntu configuration. But surprisingly, the CPU speed difference was much less pronounced in ClarkConnect (difference in blue and yellow lines in Figure 18) than in Ubuntu (difference in top red and green/blue lines in Figure 17).

Clark Connect Sempron vs. Duron Read Performance

Figure 18: Clark Connect Sempron vs. Duron Read Performance (click image to enlarge)

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hello,I recently purchased a hardware firewall and have set it up at home. With this installed, my network topology is basically internet--->firewall-...
hey guys i have a network with an ac68u as the main router and a bunch of asus/other routers in access point mode. this setup has worked fine for the ...
Hey, i know it wasn't in the plans of our beloved developer, but in the meantime wireguard seems to become more easily implementable. Technically, i h...
I would like to disable 2.4GHz Wifi on my node (AC86U). Main router (AC88U) should have it though. Can connect via SSH, and tried this:Code: wl -i wl...
Hello!This is my first post here, although I've been using Asus hardware from long time ago. I own an Asus RT-AC87U and since I discover asuswrt Merli...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3