Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

Performance - File Copy

Since we're just starting DAS coverage, I experimented a bit with a few performance measures. I tried our NAS iozone and Vista filecopy test tools and also tried HD Tune. I found that iozone, even when I used the -c switch, which in NAS across-the-network testing has the effect of removing higher-than-network-speed cached performance, provided results that were above both the 150 MB/s and 300 MB/s maximum transfer rates of 1.5 and 3.0 Gbps SATA connections until file sizes grew above 256 MBytes (Figure 4).

iozone performance

Figure 4: iozone performance

On the other hand, the Vista SP1 filecopy results were more realistic. Figure 5 is a summary of the write test results with the UMP configured in RAID 0 and 1 and with FAT32 and NTFS formatting. The USB 2.0 connection is clearly limiting the UMP's performance to the low 20 MB/s range. With a switch to the eSATA connection, write speeds jump to almost 108 MB/s for RAID 0, FAT 32 and 96 MB/s with RAID 0, NTFS.

Vista SP1 Filecopy write performance summary

Figure 5: Vista SP1 Filecopy write performance summary

The read test summary shown in Figure 6 again shows USB 2.0 connected performance in the 20 MB/s range, but slightly higher than write. The eSATA results are once more much higher, although only reaching a maximum of 83 MB/s for RAID 0, NTFS format.

Vista SP1 Filecopy read performance summary

Figure 6: Vista SP1 Filecopy read performance summary

These above results are all obtained with Windows drive write caching disabled because the Windows properties for the drive said that its write cache setting couldn't be modified (Figure 7). Each value is also the average of three filecopy runs.

Write caching can't be changed

Figure 7: Write caching can't be changed

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I've a small lan with open wifi in a public place, I'd like to serve to the connected wifi users a personal web page without go in internet and with a...
Hello,Anyone seen this? AC86U router, AC68U Aimesh Node, both are 384.17 (upgraded to 384.17, restore default manufacturer, even hard reset as well).....
I'm thinking if I should get a pair Asus Zenwifi CT8 at discounted rates from my ISP.I intend to run RT-AC68U (main router) with x2 CT8 (in Aimesh nod...
Hi, I have two routers: RT-AC3100 as principal router connected to my ISP Cablemodem, then an RT-AC66_B1 configured as Access Point to extend my wire ...
I found my wireless connection really slow today. My Wi-Fi speed is fluctuating like crazy and speed is really slow. I called my broadband provider, P...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3