Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Features


A Closer Look at "Interoperability"

Much has been made in the press in the past month or so about "interoperability problems" among draft-11g products. From what I've seen, however, this may be partly a "whisper campaign" to spread FUD to slow down the competition, and partly incorrect conclusions due to the use of inadequate test methodology.

Although you may be inclined to think "functional issues" when you hear "interoperability problems", my testing with draft-11g devices has shown throughput variation to be the dominant interoperability issue. In some cases, however, the interoperability effect on throughput is so severe that it can easily be mistaken for functional problems if simple file transfer or other techniques that look only at average or total throughput are used.

To really understand what these products are doing, you need to look at throughput performance over time, with the data preferably in graphic form. A simple example that reinforces this point is shown in Figure 1.

Linksys vs Buffalo Tech throughput - original

Figure 1: Throughput comparison - Linksys vs. Buffalo Tech - original
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

This Chariot test result, which you've seen before in Part 1of this NTK, shows the throughput performance of the first shipping Buffalo Tech and Linksys draft-11g products. Although the numerical average 21.8Mbps result for the Linksys is as indicative of the product's performance as the throughput plot, that's certainly not the case for the Buffalo Tech test pair.

You can see by looking at the lower trace in the plot that the time and duration of a measurement will make a significant difference in the results obtained. And once you start doing tests of draft-11g and 11b products running simultaneously in a mixed environment, looking at throughput vs. time is essential to understanding how the products under test are interacting.

I've also found it helpful to separate interoperability into three categories:

  • draft-11g and "Legacy" 802.11b

  • draft-11g and draft-11g (Vendor Interoperability)

  • draft-11g and 802.11b (Mixed WLAN Interoperability)

I'll look at each of these categories in the next sections.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi,I'm currently on the lookout for a router that is capable of delivering speeds of 1000/1000 mbps in a small apartment (~ 350 sq ft) with only a liv...
This is my first post. Not sure if it's in the right place. My router Rt-ac68r running latest Merlin 384.11_2 has shown a strange connected clients ma...
How does one? I cannot find any guide that really explains things.I get this error:*** Error: No ext2|ext3|ext4 partitions available. Exiting...So I n...
About how fast is the AC66U-B1 or AC86U? with HW acc Disabled? WAN throughput wise? I couldn't find much other than with it most likely turned on from...
Anyone knows what this is all about?avahi_key_new() failedI get this a lot not a while and them it stops.A search on the forum reviled nothing.I keep ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3