Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Features

Wireless Ethernet Bridges

There are only so many ways you can combine the words "Ethernet", "Wireless", and "Bridge", and marketers have tried them all! But we're going to use the term "Wireless Ethernet Bridge" or "WEB" to differentiate the newest class of product from the AP/Bridges we've just described.

The most important thing you need to know about this class of devices is that they cannot act as an Access Point! This means that you can't set them to a mode where wireless clients that are set to Infrastructure mode will be able to associate, or connect, to them.

The other, more subtle, point to know is that although WEBs can be substituted for the AP/Bridges in any of the network configurations shown so far, they make their wireless connection in a different way than AP/Bridges do. WEBs make their Point-to-Point or Point-to-Multipoint bridges by using AdHoc mode instead of a special bridging mode. This use of AdHoc mode allows WEBs to do one thing that AP/Bridges can't do. Figure 4 tells the tale.

Figure 4: Wireless Network using AdHoc mode

Figure 4: Wireless Network using AdHoc mode

If you compare Figure 4 with the previous illustrations, you'll see that by using WEBs instead of AP/Bridges, wireless clients can connect at both the local and remote ends of your bridge. But since everthing has to be set to AdHoc mode, there are some disadvantages:

  1. Infrastructure mode clients will not be able to connect
  2. All stations must be set to the same ESSID and Channel

The first negative isn't a problem if you're running your own small network, because you can control the way that users configure their clients. But if you were setting up a "HotSpot" or wireless LAN (WLAN) intended to allow anyone to connect, you would pretty much have to stick to Infrastructure mode, because that's what WLAN clients will be set to.

The second negative is more of a deal-breaker for all except the smallest networks. Because all wireless clients must use the same channel, all clients will be sharing the same bandwidth. It won't take too many clients to bog down a WLAN, even if they're only moderately busy.

Note Note Figure 4 is somewhat misleading in that it implies that certain wireless stations are associating with certain other stations. In fact, a AdHoc station will connect directly to the station that it has traffic for.

Another advantage of WEBs over AP/Bridges is that when set to Infrastructure mode, they should be able to form a bridge to any 802.11b Access Point or wireless router, instead of only another copy of themselves. Of course, you may find that a particular combination of WEB and AP that doesn't work, but that would fall into the category of "bug" vs. "by design".

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

in the 384.14 Beta firmware post, the changelog has a point about disabling the automatic usage of DoH in Firefox, and how manually turning on DoH wit...
Just got my hands on this small form factor AX router. Updated to the latest Asus firmware reset and configured. So far this thing works great full sp...
I have an RT-AC86U. Firmware Been running great since I got it about a year ago.I signed into the web interface today and notice th...
Thinking about a new router. Why?1. Linksys lack of firmware updates for bug fixing and security updates. Last update was in 2017 as I have a V1 unit....
Hi,my DIY server die under thunderstorm lighting. So I almost decided to pass to a synology nas. I have two questions1- my DIY server was configured w...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3