Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts

Wireless Performance

Signal Strength readings in the table above were reported by the NETGEAR Client application
Testing was done with a NETGEAR WG511 Cardbus client card in a WinXP Home Dell Inspiron 4100 laptop, unless otherwise noted.
Testing was done with no 802.11b clients active or in-range unless otherwise noted

Since we now know the ins and outs of draft-11g product performance, I'll be able to skip the mini-tutorial and get right to the results. If this is the first review of draft-802.11g products you've read, however, I suggest you read my 802.11g NeedToKnow to acquaint yourself with what to expect from draft-11g products.

Tip TIP: My WG602 came with version 1.03.03 firmware which had some problems working with 802.11b clients. Be sure you upgrade to version 1.04 (or higher) which is available from NETGEAR's support website.

I ran my usual four-location throughput test, the results of which are shown in the table above. I also did Chariot runs, which are shown in Figure 6.

NETGEAR WG602- Throughput test

Figure 6: Four Condition Throughput - NETGEAR
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Although the 18Mbps best-case throughput is 15% lower than below the 21Mbps I got with Broadcom-based Linksys gear, the WG602 / WG511 test pair had better performance at my weaker-signal Condition 3 and 4 test locations. I've included the four-condition throughput plot from my Linksys WRT54G review for your comparison convenience in Figure 7 below.

Linksys WRT54G - Four condition throughput test

Figure 7: Four Condition Throughput test - Linksys WRT54G and WPC54G
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

My earlier look at Intersil-based draft-11g products for my NTK Part 2 showed about a 10% WEP-enabled throughput reduction and Figure 8 shows that things haven't changed much yet. This reduction is disappointing, but Intersil told me that a fix is in the works.

NETGEAR WG602- WEP comparison

Figure 8: WEP128 vs no WEP
(click on the image for a full-sized view)

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2