Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Tests

802.11g wireless performance test results are presented in the table below:

Test Conditions:

- WEP encryption: DISABLED
- Tx Rate: Automatic
- Power Save: Disabled
- Test Partner(s): Fujitsu Lifebook P-2000F w / Internal Broadcom wireless network card

Firmware/Driver Versions :

AP f/w: V 3.60(HI.1)
Wireless client driver:


Connection Rate

TCP-IP Transfer



UDP Throughput


Condition 1

54 Mbps


1 (avg)
1 (max)


0 %

Condition 2
36 Mbps
1 (avg)
1 (max)
Condition 3
1-5 Mbps
2 (avg)
2 (max)

(Test setup details can be found here.)

Figure 16 is a Chariot screen snap after the completion of Test 1, which represents an ideal environment, with the G-2000 and client in the same room. Except for two brief drops, throughput is fairly constant at 15.7Mbps. This performance is typical of competitive products.

Chariot Test 1 (ideal environment, same room)

Figure 16: Chariot Test 1 (ideal environment, same room)
(click for larger image)

Test 2 is a typical environment where the client is 40 feet and a few walls away. Figure 17 shows a general slowdown in speed and more frequent sudden speed drops. The client showed that the connected rate had dropped to 36Mbps, but the actual throughput - 15.8Mbps - is no worse than Test 1.

Chariot Test 2 (typical environment, separated by walls and moderate distance)

Figure 17: Chariot Test 2 (typical environment, separated by walls and moderate distance)

Test 3 represents a worst-case scenario with the client separated by some formidable barriers, such as brick work and earth that drastically diminish the signal. The connection rate bounced between 1 and 5Mbps and it took several tries just to find a location that didn't drop the connection altogether. Figure 18 shows that Test 3 completed with an average transfer speed 7.5Mbps, which was higher than the connection rates shown by the client. You can also see that throughput variation was much higher than for Test 1 and 2.

Figure 18: Chariot completes Test 3 (stressed environment, separated by a brick wall and earth)

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!


Over In The Forums

I have had FiOS service here for many years (originally through Verizon, now through Frontier) for internet (75/75), TV, & our landline phone. The pho...
Got an XT8 over the holidays. Overall have been very happy with it (uptime of 20 days, great coverage, no incidents, etc).As a result of today's ongoi...
Continuation of the first thread which covered beta 1 through 3.Jan 25th: Beta 5 is now available. Changes since Beta 4:Code: 3790c8fe9a Updated docu...
For those of you aching to be beta-testers for the first 6E routers, here's a phone to go with them. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: The Ultimate Smartphon...
Hello,I'm using YazFi script to separate my guest networks I was wondering - I got a LAN network at home, and a NET1_2.4 and NET1_5 (private networks ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3