Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Tests - Mixed WLANs

Since buyers of the RM240 are likely to have old 11g and even 11b gear around, I ran some tests to gauge performance when both RangeMax 240 and other flavors or clients were associated and operating with the RM240 router. The basic setup was essentially the same that I used for the previous throughput testing, except this time I added another notebook (Fujitsu S2020 w/ Athlon 2100+, 496MB and WinXP Home SP2) that I loaded a few flavors of wireless clients into.

Update 13 March 2006: Note that Netgear's first-generation RangeMax and 108Mbps-series cards will achieve maximum raw data rates of 54 Mbps when used with the RangeMax 240 router - just like standard 802.11g cards. This is due to the RangeMax 240's use of Airgo MIMO technology and the use of Atheros Super-G technology for the original RangeMax and 108Mbps product lines.

I used the same IxChariot script as before, changed only so that the second wireless stream flowed to / from the second notebook instead of from the second Ethernet RM240 client. I left the router set at all defaults except the channel forced to 6, and both notebook adapters operated with their defaults.

My first test used a Linksys WPC54G original version card to see how the RM240 handled gen 3 True MIMO and a Broadcom-based 11g client.

Mixed RM240 and Broadcom 11g - downlink

Figure 18: Mixed RM240 and Broadcom 11g - downlink
(click on image to enlarge)

The results were similar to those I obtained in earlier True MIMO mixed WLAN testing, with both clients taking a significant throughput hit and a lot of bandwidth left unused. Figure 18 shows results with both clients running downlink, but similar effects were observed both when running uplink and if the RM240 STA started before the Broadcom STA.

Next, I tried the Atheros-based Gigabyte GN-WPEAG mini-PCI card that I had installed into the Fujitsu notebook as a DIY field upgrade. This card uses Atheros' AR5002G chipset, but I ran it with drivers that WinXP automatically installed, so I don't think any Super-G modes were enabled. (Not that it would matter, since the card would see the RM240 router as just an 11g AP anyway.)

Mixed RM240 and Atheros 11g - downlink
Figure 19: Mixed RM240 and Atheros 11g - downlink
(click on image to enlarge)

Figures 19 shows behavior similar to that obtained with the Broadcom card, although the RM240 STA appears a bit better behaved than the Broadcom.

My last experiment that involved mixing gen 2 and gen 3 Airgo clients, yielded unexpected results. I used the Belkin G Plus MIMO adapter, with its original XP driver ( and let the Belkin Client Utility run the adapter instead of XP wireless zero config. As with the other adapters tested, all settings were left at their install defaults.

Mixed RM240 and Airgo gen 2 - downlink

Figure 20: Mixed RM240 and Airgo gen 2 - downlink
(click on image to enlarge)

In both Figure 20, which shows downlink and Figure 21, which shows uplink, you can see the RM240 (Airgo gen 3) pair drop below the throughput of the gen 2 pair when both are running! I would have expected more equal throughput sharing, if not a throughput advantage for the gen 3 chipset. Evidently, Airgo still has some performance tuning left to do!

Mixed RM240 and Airgo gen 2 - uplink

Figure 21: Mixed RM240 and Airgo gen 2 - uplink
(click on image to enlarge)

I didn't run any tests using 11b clients, since the results (except for the mixed Airgo gen 2 / 3 tests) hadn't revealed significantly different behavior than I'd seen in my original True MIMO testing. Basically, when it comes to mixed WLANs, you can expect a less efficient use of total bandwidth and for Airgo clients to generally get a larger slice of the bandwidth pie.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

How many concurrent connections can the OpenVPN server handle on the RT-AC86u? I'm looking to have up to 5 users connected to my router's VPN server a...
I'm trying to access the web interface of my Draytek Vigor 130 (in bridge mode) but my Asus RT-AC86U is not letting me.I asked on the Draytek forums a...
Clearly, Asus has messed up someone confirm what version is the most stable? I don't need ethernet backhaul or AX for clients.If ...
I have a technical question for experts like @R. GerritsLet’s say I am connected to the WAN with a static subnet’s say I have have a d...
I have been using Unbound DNS for a long time as my primary DNS on my local network. Some of my client devices use NordVPN with Unbound as DNS.I have ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3