Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Overview

NETGEAR WNDR4500 N900 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router

In the original WNDR4500 review, I reported how NETGEAR had identified the source of my low 2.4 GHz downlink dual-stream test results, i.e. my use of a three-stream capable Intel 5300 card with only two antennas connected.

NETGEAR checked with both Broadcom and Intel to see what the installed base of three stream N clients with only two antennas connected was and found the answer was none. Both companies said that three stream clients were used only in notebooks with three antennas. So clearly my use of the Intel 5300 with only two antennas connected is a lone wolf.

The Acer's 1810T's original Intel 5100 card is only a 1x2 N client— 1 spatial stream for transmit (maximum 40 MHz mode link rate of 150Mbps) and 2 spatial streams for receive (maximum 40 MHz mode link rate of 300 Mbps). So I ordered up a full 2x2 N Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6200 mini PCIe card, installed it in the Acer Aspire 1810T notebook (replacing the Intel 5300 that I previously installed) and will be using this new configuration as my dual-stream test client going forward.

With this new client, I have rerun the dual-stream tests in both bands and updated the appropriate wireless benchmarks in the Router Charts, replacing the previous data. The summary and analysis with the new dual-stream data follows.

My apologies go to NETGEAR for the error and also my thanks for their help in identifying the source.

Wireless Performance - Overview

The retest Benchmark Summary is shown in Figure 1. The overall average difference between two and three stream operation still isn't that striking because three-stream N can only provide significantly higher throughput under very strong signal conditions (same room or next-room).

NETGEAR WNDR4500 benchmark summary - retest
Figure 1: NETGEAR WNDR4500 benchmark summary - retest

So that you don't have to flip back and forth between the Benchmark summary in the original review, I've compiled the two sets of dual-stream results into Table 1 and calculated the difference between them.

Test Group Retest Original % Difference
2.4 GHz 20 MHz Dn 36.9 22.2 +66
2.4 GHz 20 MHz Up 20.8 30.1 -31
2.4 GHz 40 MHz Dn 46.9 29.7 +58
2.4 GHz 40 MHz Up 26.6 37.6 -30
5 GHz 20 MHz Dn 34.0 28.9 +18
5 GHz 20 MHz Up 36.8 33.2 +11
5 GHz 40 MHz Dn 46.2 38.2 +21
5 GHz 40 MHz Up 44.2 53.3 -17
Table 1: Retest and Original Dual Stream N Benchmark Summary results

The summary shows average downlink throughput went up, but uplink average throughput went down.

Table 2 brings together the highest wireless throughput measured out of all locations in the 20 MHz mode test runs. I'm not calling out the test locations where each best throughput was found. But most times it was in Location A, with an occasional Location C.

The downlink numbers are significantly up from the original test, but the uplink numbers are about the same. This makes sense, since it was the WNDR4500 that was fooled into thinking it was connecting to a three-stream client when it was transmitting (downlink). And, of course, the simultanous down/uplink tests are higher.

Test Group Max Dn (Mbps) Max Up (Mbps) Dn/Up (Mbps)
2.4 GHz, 2 stream, 20 MHz 66 46 74
5 GHz, 2 stream, 20 MHz 55 61 58
Table 2: Highest Throughput, 20 MHz mode

Table 3 shows 40 MHz mode peak throughputs, which follow a similar pattern.

Test Group Max Dn (Mbps) Max Up (Mbps) Dn/Up (Mbps)
2.4 GHz, 2 stream, 40 MHz 75 63 94
5 GHz, 2 stream, 40 MHz 71 87 96
Table 3: Highest Throughput, 40 MHz mode

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hello,I've been using a 7800 for two years at least (if not more) and I have zero problem with it, using the latest Voxel firmware.Really great firmwa...
Hi guys,Firmware Version:384.13_beta1-g73181bd3aeI have been running Asus Merlin for a long time on my AC86U with no issues, i run a OPENVPN with sele...
Hi, has anyone tried connecting their SH3 in modem mode to a proper router via a switch with a dedicated VLAN? At the moment the SH3 and router are co...
I've set up PH on a machine on my LAN (docker PH) and when I point another machine on my LAN's DNS to the PH's IP (192.168.0.123) it works great for t...
I'm working on a script to limit my kid's computer time.For now, this is the part of the script that kicks him off when his time is up:Code: # disa...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3