Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Amped was surprised by my previous findings that the R10000G performed poorly in Location F. So I agreed to retest another sample that they provided. I retested only Location F in 20 MHz and 40 MHz bandwidth modes with the router set to Channel 1 and the router and Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 test client connected via a WPA2/AES secured connection. These are the same standard conditions used in the original test.

The updated throughput ranking in Figure 1 shows a lower total average downlink throughput for the R10000G (53.3 Mbps vs. 70.7 Mbps). Uplink results also were reduced to 48.9 Mbps from 65.2 Mbps.

Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results
Figure 1: Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results

These results reflects the fact that I was able to run IxChariot tests in Location F in the 20 MHz mode.The low throughputs I obtained, however, brought down the total average across all measured locations.

I also ran tests in 40 MHz bandwidth mode in Location F, but could not get the client to connect to the router. This contrasts with my previous results, where the client was able to connect, but not ping or start the IxChariot test.

The updated Performance Table in Figure 2 shows the very low throughput that I managed to obtain in Location F in 20 MHz bandwidth mode and the continued lack of results in 40 MHz bandwidth mode. I kept the comparison products the same, i.e. Buffalo's WZR-HP-G300NH, Ubiquiti's PowerAP N and TP-Link's TL-WR1043ND,

Wireless Performance Comparison - retest
Figure 2: Wireless Performance Comparison - retest

Figure 3 shows the 20 MHz mode Location F downlink IxChariot plot, which shows how unstable the connection was.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 3: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest

Figure 4 shows similar results for uplink. I reran both tests a few times and obtained similar results each time.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 4: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode uplink retest

Closing Thoughts

The retest results do nothing to alter my original conclusion. The performance of the Amped Wireless R10000G is still impressive, both for routing and wireless, setting new highs by a long shot on several benchmarks. But the data also still doesn't support Amped's claims of "extreme range" wireless coverage.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Although the DOT function was added to the merlin firmware. butI need to bypass DPI because I live in a country where isp censors the Internet.I've be...
Hello! First time posting, so please excuse any oversights!I'm looking to upgrade to AX with one of the options currently available. At the same time,...
I recently upgraded my router, and now I have an extra device. I was trying to think of a way to put it to use. So I was wondering if it would be diff...
Any opinions if one of these are a better choice than the other, for example known issues, current support, regular updates, etc?I can see both have f...
Asus GT-AC2900Firmware: 3.0.0.4.384_81044Whenever I use ASUSWRT on my iMac, MacBook (http and https), iPhone, or iPad, at some point within 30 minutes...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3