Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Amped was surprised by my previous findings that the R10000G performed poorly in Location F. So I agreed to retest another sample that they provided. I retested only Location F in 20 MHz and 40 MHz bandwidth modes with the router set to Channel 1 and the router and Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 test client connected via a WPA2/AES secured connection. These are the same standard conditions used in the original test.

The updated throughput ranking in Figure 1 shows a lower total average downlink throughput for the R10000G (53.3 Mbps vs. 70.7 Mbps). Uplink results also were reduced to 48.9 Mbps from 65.2 Mbps.

Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results
Figure 1: Average 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput ranking - 2.4 GHz only routers - Location F retest results

These results reflects the fact that I was able to run IxChariot tests in Location F in the 20 MHz mode.The low throughputs I obtained, however, brought down the total average across all measured locations.

I also ran tests in 40 MHz bandwidth mode in Location F, but could not get the client to connect to the router. This contrasts with my previous results, where the client was able to connect, but not ping or start the IxChariot test.

The updated Performance Table in Figure 2 shows the very low throughput that I managed to obtain in Location F in 20 MHz bandwidth mode and the continued lack of results in 40 MHz bandwidth mode. I kept the comparison products the same, i.e. Buffalo's WZR-HP-G300NH, Ubiquiti's PowerAP N and TP-Link's TL-WR1043ND,

Wireless Performance Comparison - retest
Figure 2: Wireless Performance Comparison - retest

Figure 3 shows the 20 MHz mode Location F downlink IxChariot plot, which shows how unstable the connection was.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 3: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest

Figure 4 shows similar results for uplink. I reran both tests a few times and obtained similar results each time.

R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode downlink retest
Figure 4: R10000G Location F 20 MHz mode uplink retest

Closing Thoughts

The retest results do nothing to alter my original conclusion. The performance of the Amped Wireless R10000G is still impressive, both for routing and wireless, setting new highs by a long shot on several benchmarks. But the data also still doesn't support Amped's claims of "extreme range" wireless coverage.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hello,Could you please help me with a compile for grive2 file in order to include the changes available on Github, here https://github.com/Entware/rtn...
SO... on RT-AC5300 smart connect for tri-band gets downgraded to dual band. that is my first notice.I have RT-AC5300 as my main router AIMESH router.T...
Hi.I'm now using the AC66_B1 router mainly as a bridge/repeater. The TV, receiver, nas, tv-box ... are connected through the lan ports (fixed IP) and ...
hi all,I changed from hugo to merlin on the ac5300 at a friends place and the range is significantly lesser. The places where I used to get 3 bars is ...
Hi all, new user and first post here.I'm planning my first NAS setup. Up to now I've primarily used Google Drive for what backing up I do, but my inte...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3