Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Retest

Introduction

Shortly after we posted the Archer C9 review, TP-LINK let us know our results didn't match what they found with testing in their own Octoscope-based test setup. The culprit was that the C9's stand-up format positioned a good portion of the router's antennas above our test chamber antennas, reducing received signal. This is clearly seen in the test setup photo below.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

A quick retest with the router laid down so that all parts of its antennas were lower did in fact show significant improvement.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

So we went back and reran wireless tests for all stand-up format routers to ensure we were not unfairly penalizing them.

The firmwares and routers in this retest are:

  • ASUS RT-AC68U: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • ASUS RT-AC68P: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • Buffalo WXR-1900DHP: 2.3.0
  • Linksys EA9200: Ver.1.1.5 (Build 164615)
  • TP-LINK Archer C8: 3.16.28 Build 20141023
  • TP-LINK Archer C9: 3.15.27 Build 20141015

The retest improved 5 GHz performance in most cases. But 2.4 GHz performance was either essentially the same or slightly degraded.

The affected routers fall into AC1750, AC1900 and AC3200 classes. So that's how we'll compare before and after.

AC1750

TP-LINK's Archer C8 definitely benefited from the retest, moving from #3 to #1 rank among AC1750 class routers tested with the current process.

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

The C8's performance summary shows strong 5 GHz performance helped boost its ranking.

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

This is clearly seen comparing 5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation plots of the top four ranked routers. Not only does the C8's overall throughput curve move higher, but it remains connected out to 39 dB of attenuation.

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz uplink throughput isn't as dramatic, but improves mostly with lower attenuation levels (stronger signals). Check the gallery below for a full set of before and after plots.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out the new Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Featured Sponsors


Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I have bought Ubiquiti Edgerouter Lite ERlite-3, and early October I have appointment with computer tech guy to come out to do house call to configure...
Hi All,I seem to get random reboots, mostly when UDP (gaming) traffic is running through the AC-5300 I have that's running 380.68_2.Being an IT guy, I...
Hi allI have recently upgraded to 380.68_2 (will update my signature), essentially because of the warning on the web gui which I got running my previo...
My ISP is crap and I really need a new router that can fail over to a 3G/LTE USB dongle (Huawei E5xxx something something) connection when the main co...
Hi,I have recently used a USB 3.0 4TB drive with my AC-5300. I have a problem with he amount of free space reported as free space in both a windows an...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Get Backblaze Now!