Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Retest

Introduction

Shortly after we posted the Archer C9 review, TP-LINK let us know our results didn't match what they found with testing in their own Octoscope-based test setup. The culprit was that the C9's stand-up format positioned a good portion of the router's antennas above our test chamber antennas, reducing received signal. This is clearly seen in the test setup photo below.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - original test

A quick retest with the router laid down so that all parts of its antennas were lower did in fact show significant improvement.

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

TP-LINK Archer C9 in test chamber - retest

So we went back and reran wireless tests for all stand-up format routers to ensure we were not unfairly penalizing them.

The firmwares and routers in this retest are:

  • ASUS RT-AC68U: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • ASUS RT-AC68P: 3.0.0.4.378_3873
  • Buffalo WXR-1900DHP: 2.3.0
  • Linksys EA9200: Ver.1.1.5 (Build 164615)
  • TP-LINK Archer C8: 3.16.28 Build 20141023
  • TP-LINK Archer C9: 3.15.27 Build 20141015

The retest improved 5 GHz performance in most cases. But 2.4 GHz performance was either essentially the same or slightly degraded.

The affected routers fall into AC1750, AC1900 and AC3200 classes. So that's how we'll compare before and after.

AC1750

TP-LINK's Archer C8 definitely benefited from the retest, moving from #3 to #1 rank among AC1750 class routers tested with the current process.

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

AC1750 Ranking Comparison

The C8's performance summary shows strong 5 GHz performance helped boost its ranking.

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

TP-LINK Archer C8 Ranker Performance Summary

This is clearly seen comparing 5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation plots of the top four ranked routers. Not only does the C8's overall throughput curve move higher, but it remains connected out to 39 dB of attenuation.

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz downlink throughput vs. attenuation comparison - AC1750

5 GHz uplink throughput isn't as dramatic, but improves mostly with lower attenuation levels (stronger signals). Check the gallery below for a full set of before and after plots.

More Wireless

Zyxel logo

Is Cloud-Based Network Management Right for You? - Cloud managed networks aren't just for Enterprises anymore.

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Featured Sponsors



Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi could you please consider reviewing the latest OpenWrt 18.06.1. You could flash it to the WRT 3200acm as this is one of it's features, to be able t...
Hyia all,I've installed my brand new Asus RT-AC86U with Merlin 384.6 replacing my Netgear D6400/AC1600.I'm facing a strange issue : I can't connect to...
I only know the basics so looking for some assistance. I have a heavy duty ASUS GT5300 that is our main router. It’s handling about 50 smart devices r...
View attachment 14152 ​ The dual-bay QNAP TS-215B NAS, designed for home and small office use, is powered by Intel’s 14nm Celeron J3355 dual-core 2.0...
CaptainSTX said:↑ I run all my IoT devices on the router connected directly to the Internet. The devices that use WiFi connect using guest networks ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3