Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow NAS arrow NAS Reviews arrow Head to Head: Tritton Simple NAS vs. Hawking Net-Storage Center
Head to Head: Tritton Simple NAS vs. Hawking Net-Storage Center Print E-mail
Jim Buzbee   
August 07, 2005

Introduction

Tritton Simple NAS

Tritton Simple NAS
Summary BYOD enclosure to turn a 3.5" IDE drive into a SAMBA-based NAS drive

Hawking Net-Stor Network Storage Center

Hawking Net-Stor Network Storage Center
Summary BYOD enclosure to turn a 3.5" IDE drive into a SAMBA-based NAS drive

I've looked at a number of disk-included Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices lately, but this time I'm going to take a look at a couple of "bring your own disk" (BYOD) boxes.

After my last review of Maxtor's Shared Storage Drive, a reader pointed out an issue that I had not considered. With some of the devices that include a disk, if the disk fails out of warranty, the device becomes useless. The consumer can't replace the disk with a new one because often the disk itself contains part of the operating system.

But with a device where the drive is not included, the consumer can always replace or upgrade the disk because by definition, the firmware has the ability to initialize a new disk. BYOD devices can also help you save a few bucks, especially if, like many of us, you have a spare IDE drive (or two) lying around or salvageable from a retired PC.

In this review, I'm going to compare two inexpensive BYOD devices - the Tritton Simple NAS and the Hawking Technologies Net-Stor. Both of these companies sell these products either with or without an included disk. But for my review, I'm going to look at the versions that don't include a disk.



Tags: BYOD, Hawking, NAS, Tritton,

Related Articles:

ADS NAS Drive kit
LaCie Ethernet Disk mini
Maxtor Shared Storage Drive
Trendnet TS-I300: Simple, pricey BYOD NAS
TRENDnet USB 2.0 Network Storage Server
 

Most Read

 
 

Over At The Forums

D-Link DNS-323 Mysteries
Hello folks. I'm having issues with my Nas and looking for some thoughts. 1. The 323 gets recognised by Vista as a network device but...

Gigabit Network Help!
I have a gigabit NAS (D-link 323) that I have connected to a D-Link DGS-1005D gigabit switch. I then have my desktop connected to...

Synology DS-209+ review up!!
Looks real good. Now Netgear needs to play catchup and dump that old Infrant CPU for something more modern and powerful!! http://www.trustedreviews.com/networ...ion-DS-209-/p1

Real world NAS vs XP performance
I'm interested in a NAS like the Qnap TS 509 to store a lot of photo image files. We currently use a Windows XP SP3...

FCC OET Filings--November
For a device to utilize the radio spectrum in the United States, the FCC requires hardware manufacturers to apply for the relevant license. These publically-accessible...

Slideshows

NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro Western Digital ShareSpace QNAP TS-509 Pro D-Link DNS-343 4-Bay Network Storage Enclosure Thecus N3200 RAID 5 NAS D-Link DIR-628 RangeBooster N Dual Band Router More

Win This!

Enter to Win!

You could win a Trendnet TEW-633GR Wireless N Gigabit Router and two TEW-621PC 300Mbps Wireless N-Draft PC Cards

Learn How!

 

Ldr:0.00161099433899, Rct:0.00565814971924, Sky:0.00738310813904, Tlink:0.238586187363, TopPG:0.238659143448, GQV:0.238790035248 seconds to load.