Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts


To check performance on the two products, I ran the iozone tool using the test methodology described here. In my specific case, iozone was running under OSX version 10.4.1 on my iBook, which is loaded with 640 MB of RAM. The disk I used is a 120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 7200 RPM drive with 8 MB of cache and ATA/133 interface. As you peruse the results, keep in mind that the maximum raw data rate for 100Mbps Ethernet is 12500 kBytes/sec.

First, I ran iozone against the Net-Stor, with Figures 9 and 10 showing read and write runs respectively.

Net-Stor Read Performance
Figure 9: Net-Stor Read Performance
(click image to enlarge)

The tests show the performance is lower than the other drives I've tested, which typically have speeds between 6-8 kBytes/sec for read and 5-6 kBytes/sec for write.

Net-Stor Write Performance
Figure 10: Net-Stor Write Performance

(click image to enlarge)

Running the same tests against the Simple NAS, however, shows even poorer performance (Figures 11 and 12). Especially of note is that read performance is worse than write - the opposite of what I've observed with other drives.

Simple NAS Read Performance
Figure 11: Simple NAS Read Performance

(click image to enlarge)

Simple NAS Write Performance
Figure 12: Simple NAS Write Performance

(click image to enlarge)

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2