Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts


We tested with 3.7.3 Build 20120801 using our standard NAS test process. Apples to apples comparisons for the TS-269 Pro were a little hard to come by, since other Atom D2700 powered NASes, such as the Synology DS1512+ and Thecus N4800 , have additional drives and no RAID1 performance numbers. The closest two-bay competitor to the TS-269 Pro is the NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro 2 (RNDP2210), which sports a dual-core Intel Atom D525 CPU.

The Benchmark summary below shows Windows File copy write in RAID 1 configuration measured 84 MB/s, with file copy read almost 15 MB/s higher at 97 MB/s.

QNAP TS269Pro Benchmark Summary

How does this compare? I first filtered the RAID 1 File Copy Write and Read charts to show only Atom D2700 NASes and one two-bay Atom D525 NAS. All of the D2700 variants use more drives than the TS-269 Pro and had no RAID1 performance numbers. So RAID1 numbers could only be compared with the NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro 2 (RNDP2210).

File Copy Write Comparison - Atom two-bay products

File Copy Write Comparison - Atom two-bay products

RAID 1 File copy performance is slightly better than the Netgear ReadyNAS.

File Copy Read Comparison - Atom two-bay products

File Copy Read Comparison - Atom two-bay products

NASPT RAID 1 File Copy write benchmarks were less evenly matched at 111 MB/s for write and 94 MB/s for read. The tougher NASPT RAID 1 Directory Copy tests ran 16 MB/s from the NAS and 19 MB/s to it. The performance was significantly better than the Netgear ReadyNAS Pro 2 (RNDP2210), which wrote at 11 MB/s and read at 15 MB/s.

For attached backup tests, the Iomega UltraMax Pro has been retired in favor of a higher performance solution. We have switched to a Startech USB 3.0 eSATA to SATA Hard Drive Docking Station (SATDOCKU3SEF) containing a WD Velociraptor WD3000HLFS 300 GB drive. Best attached backup speed of 114 MB/s was with NTFS and worst was 91 MB/s with EXT3! Both results are extremely impressive!

Rsync network backup was less impressive, measuring 38 MB/s to the NAS testbed running Delta Copy. The ReadyNAS measured 44 MB/s here, while the Thecus and Synology 38 MB/s and 37 MB/s respectively.

Rsync backup Comparison

Rsync backup Comparison

iSCSI write and read to a 10 GB RAID 1 volume produced 88 MB/s and 89 MB/s. The write numbers were middle of the pack with the Synology recording 97 MB/s, the Thecus 91MB/s above and the NETGEAR at 76 MB/s below. Read was top of the charts however with the closest being Synology (85 MB/s), followed by Thecus (79 MB/s) and the NETGEAR coming in at 54 MB/s.


Atom-powered NASes certainly perform, but they are pricey! The TS-269 Pro delivers performance you'd expect from its CPU, but prices in just under $600, without drives. By comparison, you can spend about the same money for the NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro 2 (RNDP2210) and two 1 TB drives are included. Or if you'd rather have more storage, increase your budget by $50 more and you can get the RAID 5 capable, four-bay Thecus N4800.

I didn't include it in the performance comparisons since it's only a single core Atom D425 NAS. But two-bay Synology DS712+ is also worth noting on the bottom line. Diskless for just under $500, it had similar performance to the TS-269 Pro and has the added bonus of expanding far beyond two drives via an optional expansion cabinet.

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2