Comments moved to the Forums

Photo of author

Tim Higgins

The existing comments have been left in place in the articles, but no new comments can be added. Instead, a link has been added to the bottom of each page that will take you to the correct SNB Forum, where you can start a thread to discuss an article, or add to an existing discussion.

For now, we’re letting unregistered users post in the Article Discussion forums only. But posts by unregistered users will be moderated before they appear. Registered users’ posts will appear right away, just as in the other Forums.

We hope that you like the change. Please let us know if you see any problems or have any suggestions about this change.

Related posts

Should we let vendors pitch?

It has been SmallNetBuilder’s policy to not publish articles written by vendors. The reason is that most vendor-supplied articles are ...

Performance Charts Get Improved

Over the weekend, we've tweaked the NAS and Router Charts to increase your product comparison pleasure.

11n Draft 2.0 gear not working yet, but does anyone really care?

I share Glenn Fleishman's disappointment with this week's announcement by the Wi-Fi Alliance that they have only begun their certification testing. But judging from what I've seen so far, getting draft 11n gear up to spec is going to be a long, difficult process.

I spent a few days last week testing a D-Link DIR-655 router and DWA-652 Cardbus card, which are based on Atheros XSPAN silicon. These are the first products to have firmware and drivers posted that allegedly implement 11n Draft 2.0 compliance. My primary focus was to see whether the legacy protection mechanisms added in 802.11n Draft 2.0 were working in actual product.