Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

LAN & WAN Features

Introduction

Judging from some of the feedback in the gigabit switch reviews we've published this year—8 Port Gigabit Switch Roundup | $250 Gigabit Smart Switch Roundup—some readers are having problems getting the boost in performance they expected from upgrading to a gigabit LAN.

The problems usually arise when there is a mixture of gigabit and Fast Ethernet (100 Mbps) clients. The problem scenario usually involves simultaneous transfers from a single gigabit-equipped client to a mix of gigabit and Fast Ethernet clients. Figure 1 illustrates the troublesome setup. (The Netgear switch is just used for illustration. The problem is common to virtually all non-managed gigabit switches.)

Flow Control test setup

Figure 1: Flow Control test setup

The expected behavior in this configuration is for the sender's gigabit bandwidth to be divided between the two receivers. Each receiver would lose some throughput due to the overhead of the simultaneous tranfers. But both would still function at speeds near those experienced when running solo.

But what readers have reported are instances of gigabit links being forced to Fast Ethernet speeds. One reader said that merely plugging a NIC running at 100 Mbps into a gigabit switch was enough to force all gigabit links to 100 Mbps speed. But the more common scenario requires simultaneous transfers from a single gigabit machine to a mix of gigabit and 100 Mbps computers.

The Culprit - Flow Control

Once a helpful reader (thanks, Walken!) provided a detailed description of the problem and some links to supporting documentation, the reason for this behavior made sense. The problem is caused by 802.3x Flow Control.

Flow control was intended to handle the situation where a transmitting computer is sending data faster than a receiving machine can handle it. The IEEE 802.3x standard specifies a PAUSE flow control mechanism communicated via MAC Control frames in full duplex Ethernet link segments. Like jumbo frames, the PAUSE mechanism requires all device in the data flow path to support it, which includes the switch.

Unfortunately, it seems (at least in small networks) that 802.3x does more harm than good. This may be partly because it duplicates the loss-based flow control mechanism already built into the TCP protocol. But whatever, the reason, I was able to confirm that the throughput loss that some people were attributing to "defective" or "low performance" switches, was in fact, due to Flow Control.

More LAN & WAN

Featured Sponsors




Top Ranked Routers

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

So, a number of years ago when we moved into this house I looked at the options for getting network connectivity where I wanted it. Settled on a combi...
Firmware: 380.65Astrill JFF v: 2.9.9.1Router AC-5300I used the Astrill VPN app, installed and it persists after reboot.Unfortunately, when I try to ad...
Now that BRT-AC828 was released, is there any chance of adding some of its features to Merlin FW?I don't know if there is any hardware limitation on t...
AC56RFirmware tried with same issueMerlin 380.65Merlin-LTS 22E4Stock 3.0.0.4.380.7266ISP Comcast 85mbpsRecently replaced my old E2000 running Tomato U...
Are there any known problems with SSDP in Asuswrt-Merlin? I have two TV set top boxes connected to LAN1 and LAN2 and they are identified as IPTV ports...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3