Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Features

Everyone seems to be asking what the difference is between D-Link's popular DNS-323 dual-drive BYOD NAS [reviewed] and the very similar DNS-321 that D-Link hasn't even bothered to officially announce. So let's take a quick look to clear things up.

First, D-Link says that the 321 is not replacing the 323, but is a "strategic" product intended to compete with lower cost dual-drive alternatives.

D-Link DNS-321 2-Bay Network Storage Enclosure

Figure 1: The D-Link DNS-321

Both are pretty much the same size, which is that of a smallish black toaster—without the bread slots. Figure 2 shows the plain, but attractive front panel, which uses the currently de rigueur blue LEDs for all indicators. The figure doesn't call out the LED at the bottom of the vertical strip, which flashes during startup and shutdown.


D-Link DNS-321 Front panel

Figure 2: Front panel

Figure 3 shows the rear panel, which reveals the first difference between the 321 and 323. There is no USB 2.0 port, which means no drive expansion or built-in print server. The Ethernet port, however, is 10/100/1000.

D-Link DNS-321 Rear panel

Figure 3: Rear panel

The bigger differences, however, lie inside the 321, which uses a completely different board than the 323. Figure 4 shows the 321's board while Figure 5 is the 323's.

D-Link DNS-321 main board
Click to enlarge image

Figure 4: Main board

Both use Marvell "Orion" processors, but the 321 uses an 88F5182-A2 C400 (400 MHz clock), which has the SATA interface built in. The 323 uses a Marvell 88F5181 (clocked at 500 MHz), which is combined with a Marvell 88X7042 PCIe to Serial ATA Controller chip.

DNS-323 main board
Click to enlarge image

Figure 5: DNS-323 main board

The 321's Ethernet comes from a Marvell 88E1118, while the 323 uses a Marvell 88E1111—not a significant difference. Both products have 64 MB of RAM soldered to their boards. But the 323 has only 8 MB of flash while the 321 has 16 MB.

A quick run through the web GUI shows equivalent features, except for the missing print server in the 321. This means that the 321 still has iTunes and UPnP AV media servers as well as FTP and DHCP servers.

What I didn't see is any indication of BitTorrent support in the Download Scheduler or jumbo frame controls in the LAN settings. Both features were added back in May to the DNS-323 via 1.05 firmware. A check with D-Link revealed that up to 9K jumbo frames are supported—automatically, apparently—but that the lack of BitTorrent download support is one of the reasons for the 321's lower price.

So are the missing USB port and BitTorrent download support worth saving $40 over? You might want to wait a day or so until testing is complete before making that decision.

Updated 7/21/2008: Read the full review.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out the new Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Featured Sponsors

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

OK.Not only is this a first post, but it is post by a person that is massively frustrated, so I hope you guys can help me.About 99% of the time, when ...
Hello - Can you help me please?I live in an apartment complex and have an AC68U which is working fine but I have a Internet TV Box that only has the 2...
I was looking for a dual band (esp. 5ghz) wifi adapter which has good range and stable connection. I came across these -Edup EP-AC1621 Tp-Link Arche...
First I want to say that as I have been reading for hours in these forums how much I appreciate the quality of the responses. I have very little netwo...
I'm trying to PORT forward all my traffic via a VPN connection to my house. The server is running on an AC3200 using MerlinWRT, and on my laptop I'm u...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Get Backblaze Now!