Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS How To

Enter, the VelociRaptor

Since in Part 2, I had reached the "It's the Drive, Stupid!" conclusion, I contacted Western Digital who kindly provided a few of their WD3000HLFS VelociRaptor drives, which are, according to WD, "The Fastest SATA Drive in the Known Universe".

The VelociRaptor is the second generation of WD's "Raptor" line, which are all based on 10,000 RPM 2.5" drive mechanisms. For the 3.5" models, the 2.5" drive is ensconced in a heatsink / frame dubbed the "IcePack" (Figure 3).

Figure 3: WD VelociRaptor

A quick check with Simpli Software's HD Tach confirmed a > 100 MB/s average read transfer rate (Figure 4).

WHS and QNAP TS-509 Pro Rdad Performance Comparison
Click to enlarge image

Figure 4: VelociRaptor HD Tach results

Figure 5 adds two test runs with the VelociRaptors to the tests shown in Figure 2. (I removed the TS-509 Pro, PCI run to reduce chart clutter.)

So we now have:

  1. 2 GB - NAS configured as in Table 1, with 2 GB of memory
  2. 1 GB - Same as #1, but with NAS memory reduced to 1 GB
  3. TS-509Pro, 1x1TB - QNAP TS-509 Pro with a single 1 TB drive
  4. 1GB, VRaptor - NAS memory @ 1 GB, iozone memory @ 512 MB
  5. 1GB, VRaptor, 4kjum - same as #4, but w/ 4k jumbo LAN connection

The interesting thing in this graph is that the VelociRaptor doesn't improve write performance until we hit the 2 GB non-cached test. But there, it keeps performance up near 80 MB/s, while the Seagate drive drops off to around 51 MB/s. Note also that using 4k jumbo frames actually reduced performance.

Write Performance Comparison w/ VelociRaptor
Click to enlarge image

Figure 5: Write Performance Comparison w/ VelociRaptor

Read performance (Figure 6) shows that the VelociRaptor has some value-add. Throughput drops only to 51 MB/s for the 2 GB file size, while the Barracuda sinks to 15 MB/s when caching stops. But there is still no performance improvement for most of the file sizes—the "Wall" remained intact.

Read Performance Comparison w/ VelociRaptor
Click to enlarge image

Figure 6: Read Performance Comparison w/ VelociRaptor

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

My WIFI has failed,stopped/quit twice in the last two days.Suddenly, theres no SSID broadcast and all wifi devices fail to see the WIFI and the router...
Buonasera! Ho impostato un profilo VPN. se inserisco le policy rules per inseire alcuni device sotto tunnel VPN ed altri liberi in WAN, succede che co...
I am about to run a script for the first time to configure a new bridge and move the guest wifi/new vlan to it. I am not quite getting which interface...
Using an Asus Rt-AC68p router with latest Asuswrt-Merlin installed. I have a mobile hotspot (At&t) connected to its USB port and USB activated in the ...
I have a pair of RT-AC66U_B1 routers with OpenVPN set up between them -- a client (Maryland, 192.168.58.XXX) and server (Virginia, 192.168.60.xxx). Vi...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3