Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews


I ran the MSS through our standard testing procedure and found the MSS' performance to be quite good. Figures 26 and 27 are composite read and write throughput vs. filesize plots for the two benchmark tests we ran. These were generated using the NAS Chart Compare Benchmarks feature. Remember that the MSS doesn't support RAID and it doesn't support jumbo frames. So the only benchmarks ran were with 100 and 1000 Mbps LAN connections.

Write performance comparison
Click to enlarge image

Figure 26: Write performance comparison

The plots show that you definitely want to run the MSS with a gigabit connection since a 100 Mbps LAN will significantly limit its performance. The MSS has the typical drop in performance with increasing filesize seen with most NASes

Read performance comparison
Click to enlarge image

Figure 27: Read performance comparison

Fans of small filesizes will find that the MSS ranks at the top of the NAS Charts for all four benchmarks run. The MSS' 512MB of memory certainly contributes to this, but there are probably other optimizations at work in the WHS OS, too.

I also used the NAS Charts to compare a few four drive NASes from the top of the 1000 Mbps charts: the Synology CS407, Thecus N5200 and Buffalo Terastation Pro II. Figure 28 shows that the MSS dominates the group in write performance, with the Thecus N5200 coming in second. Even though it's about a year old now, the N5200's performance continues to hold up well against newer designs.

Write performance competitive comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN
Click to enlarge image

Figure 28: Write performance competitive comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

The MSS' read performance isn't as clearly superior. It's the best for 32, 64 and 128 MB filesizes, but runs neck-and-neck with the Buffalo TeraStation Pro II for larger filesizes.

Read performance competitive comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN
Click to enlarge image

Figure 29: Read performance competitive comparison - 1000 Mbps LAN

You can also generate your own charts to look at other modes and compare products.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

No matter what I put for upload/download bandwidth on a new RT-AX88U on Merlin 384.18, it will peg the upload speed at my ISP's maximum speed and ping...
Hi to all!I just installed Pyload and Transmission on my RT-AC86U. Now I have a problem. I have to set the router ( to go to Internet thro...
Which one is better?I need to enable VPN in my router and the VPN that I use which is told me that I cannot do it on my TP-Link Archer C5400X ...
Hi There,Update 2020/08/06386 rc2-3 firmware is in this link
I just picked up my XT8, updated both to the latest release firmware. So, I set them up in a mesh wireless config- a few questions:I'm getting ~400Mbp...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3