Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

Introduction

D-Link DNS-323 2 Bay Network Storage Enclosure

 

At a Glance
Product D-Link 2 Bay Network Storage Enclosure (DNS-321)
Summary Slightly lower-cost version of popular dual-drive RAID 1 NAS
Pros • Decent performance for the money
• Automatic up to 9k jumbo frame support
• Supports separate drives, JBOD, RAID 0, RAID 1
• FTP, iTunes, UPnP AV servers
• Quiet
Cons • No USB print server
• No logging
• Tricky RAID 1 fail recovery

Our DNS-323 review has always been among our top five most-read NAS reviews, pretty much from the day it was published in late 2006. So I think it's safe to assume that D-Link has sold a pile of them. But D-Link has decided to put buyers who have been eyeing the 323 in a bit of a pickle with the addition of the DNS-321.

The 321 is a dual-drive NAS that matches the 323 on a feature-for-feature basis with two exceptions. Its download manager doesn't handle BitTorrent and it has no USB port to support USB print serving. In return for accepting these deleted features, D-Link will let your wallet be about $40 fatter if you opt for the 321. But will you also suffer a performance hit if you decide to go for the less expensive option? We'll see shortly.

Internal Details

The Inside Story: D-Link DNS-321 vs. DNS-323 article has a comparison of the 323 and 321's boards. Figure 1 shows the 321's board, which is completely different than the 323's.

D-Link DNS-321 main board
Click to enlarge image

Figure 1: DNS-321 Main board

The most significant difference is that the 321 uses a Marvell 88F5182-A2 C400 (clocked at 400 MHz), which has the SATA interface built in, while the 323 uses a Marvell 88F5181 (clocked at 500 MHz) combined with a Marvell 88X7042 PCIe to Serial ATA Controller chip.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi allIt seems that devices on 5G-1 and 5G-2 cannot "see" each other.On Wireshark it seems some packets can't traverse from one 5G band to the other. ...
Hello, I'm looking for advice for the build in the subject line. I'm a landscape architect starting my own small office. It will be two people at firs...
So I have a newer RT-AC3100 I've been running as my main router the past few months. I also had two older RT-N66 running as APs also. Everything was f...
Is this ok to do ? Also allow only specified ip address.I want to do this my for cousins so i don't have to go over there every time.I notice the 86u ...
About 2 years ago the WAN port on my R7000 died. About a year and a half ago I managed to get Tomato 1.28.0000 -140 K26ARM USB AIO-64K installed, with...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3