Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Blog

My initial tests didn't look very promising and after some back-and-forth with D-Link, I'm even less encouraged. I'll have full details in an upcoming review, but basically I see no sign that the Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) mechanism added in Draft 2.0 is working properly.

Specifically, a Draft 2.0 AP that is in 40 MHz channel mode is supposed to immediately switch to using the legacy-friendly 20 MHz channel mode and stay there for 30 minutes if it detects a device using the extension channel. (For example, for an AP in 40 MHz mode set to Channel 1, the extension channel is 6.) The device in the extension channel doesn't even have to be actively transmitting; beaconing APs or probing STAs should be sufficient to trigger the CCA fallback. Despite repeated attempts, I have yet to see an AP switch from 40 to 20 MHz channel mode with this experiment.

But as the certification and standards-making processes drag on, it looks like few people really care. New draft 11n products continue to appear and consumers buy them ($150M worth to date, according to a recent Dell'Oro Group report) with the main deterrent to purchase being price rather than interoperability or compatibility.

Even the enterprise wireless guys are jumping on the bandwagon, with Meru shipping a two-radio draft 11n AP and controller this summer to be installed at Morrisville State College in upstate New York and Colubris, Trapeze and Ruckus Wireless also announcing draft 11n gear.

So, yeah, big deal, the first Draft 2.0 products still don't work right. As long as D-Link is willing to cut the price enough, they'll sell. It's enough to make me want to stop rigourously testing this stuff, since not many buyers seem to care.

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Featured Sponsors



Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Currently i'm running Voxels latest build ( V1.0.2.54SF) which overall seems to work just fine. I know I can set a client device to low,medium,high,hi...
My routers traffic analyzer shows Wistron Infocomm (Zhongshan) Co as a client.Mostly no activity, but some days 3GB download.Any thoughts as to what t...
I enable stateful vs stateless in order to have routable IPV6 addresses.After doing that, and a quick restart of the router, I checked that the target...
Purchased a Blue Cave about a month ago. When I first installed it, I ran some speed tests that were coming in at 160mbps/160mbps - right where it sh...
I switched ISPs recently and now port 80 is closed and Let's Encrypt is unable to renew. Looking for a way now to circumvent this, any help would be g...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3