Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Blog

What I found is that the Certification "Out of the Box" (OOB) settings for Draft 2.0 11n devices operating in the 2.4 GHz band include having 20 MHz mode enabled. This was confirmed in a call today with the Alliance’s Technical Director Greg Ennis, who said that there is still ongoing debate within the IEEE on the implementation details of 2.4 GHz 20 / 40 MHz channel mode. So in the interest of getting the Certification process moving, the Alliance decided not to include any 40 MHz channel testing in the 2.4 GHz band.

Note that manufacturers are free to include the option of allowing the user to enable 40 MHz channel mode for the 2.4 GHz band, without violating either IEEE Draft 2.0 or the Alliance's Draft 2.0 Certification. But what happens when the product is in that mode is up to whatever the manufacturer chooses to do. So expect experimentation and a variety of "good" and "bad neighbor" behaviors from now until 11n is finally approved.

And while the Alliance does not plan to update its Draft 11n Certification process until the IEEE spec is released, there is possibility for oversight via the Alliance's "Extensions Policy". This policy, which came into effect after the Atheros "Super-G" controversy, will also be applied to Draft 11n, as described in this Alliance FAQ:

Any product with a feature extension (such as an early feature of the IEEE 802.11n draft standard) that causes severe performance degradation and interoperability issues with another Wi-Fi CERTIFIED™ product can have its certification revoked. The Wi-Fi Alliance® has a formal process for vendors to file grievances. This policy is in place to protect user experience, but at the same time, to allow for innovation and differentiation of products from vendors.

So if you're going to make the jump to Draft 11n product and plan to enable 40 MHz channels in 2.4 GHz, realize that anything goes when it comes to cooperation neighboring wireless LANs. You might find angry neighbors banging on your door accusing you of knocking their wireless off the air. Then again, you might find your throughput severly reduced, too.

So the long road to 802.11n continues. Hang on, folks, because Wi-Fi mark or no, there still be plenty of dragons ahead. Arrrrghhh!

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

My GT-AC5300 is only getting between 50mbps and 150mbps. I have a gigabit connection. From the modem directly, I get 900mbps. I've changed cables and ...
Hi folks, Wondering if you're able to help. Recently upgraded from the ISP-provided router for our gigabit fibre to the Asus RT-AC86U. With the defaul...
So, this is a thing that has bugged me for a long time. When I am on the Network Map page, I see the clients connected with 31 connected clients. Then...
I ran into this issue early today and figure to upgrade the firmware to 384.8_2 since it is available (hoping that fixes the issue)...But I still can ...
Hi..This is related to Asus RT-AC88U firmware version 384.8_2 but I always get "Cannot assign requested address" and "Failed to get IP for interface e...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3