Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Other Features

Conclusion

While researching options for this article, I ran across some studies indicating that virtual machines can suffer significant issues both in processing and network performance. One study stated that "performance degradation by a factor of 2 to 3x for receive workloads, and a factor of 5x degradation for transmit workloads" could occur in some virtual servers.

Although this extreme level of degradation wasn't my experience, my virtual FreeNAS appliance did not perform as well as my physical FreeNAS appliance, most glaringly with Read performance (Figure 3) running 15-20% slower on the virtual machine, even with significant amounts of RAM allocated to the virtual machine.

Keep in mind that the virtualization I've created is through the free VMware Server software, which enables virtualization, but at the expense of adding two software layers to the normal BIOS and OS equation. I would expect that using VMware's license-based Hypervisor will close, if not eliminate the performance gaps experienced using VMware Server. The fact that there is some performance degradation is understandable, considering the virtual machine must go through additional processing to gain access to the physical layer.

Further, I ran my tests using different hardware platforms, with a 3.2 GHz CPU (Intel Prescott 3.2E) on my virtualization platform, as opposed to a 1.8 GHz CPU (AMD 3000+) on my physical platform. If anything, the virtualization platform should have had an edge in processing capability.

Nevertheless, free virtualization software merits strong consideration, despite its performance disadvantage. The reduction in power consumption, noise and heat generation, and space consumed by multiple physical boxes is certainly a positive outcome of virtualization. Further, the flexibility of creating multiple networks to support both virtual and physical traffic is a useful option for managing traffic flows and network capacity.

Overall, even with the slower performance of the virtual machine, I'm going to dismantle my physical FreeNAS appliance and re-install its RAM and hard drive in my Host server, free up the shelf space, and minimize the amount of cash I have to send to my electric company.

More Stuff

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

My Asus RT-N66U router log often has this line:Nov 7 04:01:01 pptpd[762]: MGR: Maximum of 100 connections reduced to 10, not enough IP addresses given...
I have tried to update my firmware from 384.6_0 to 384.7_0 or 384.7_2 but none of them take.To troubleshoot I have tried even flashing a downgrade to ...
Garmin vĂ­vosmart 3, Fitness/Activity Tracker with Smart Notifications and Heart Rate Monitoring, BlackPrice: $72.96Shipping: FREEDeal link: https://ww...
Security is a measurePrivacy is a view of the mindCorrect me if I am wrong?
I've just set up a DDNS using No-ip's service. That's obviously a pay service unless you keep renewing your DDNS every 30 days.My question is can I us...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3