Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Routing

The 2100's user interface won't win any design awards, and I found it a little confusing until I got the hang of it. There are two privilege levels - User (the default) and Admin - and Basic and Advanced settings levels within each privilege. Figures 4 and 5 show the User and Admin views respectively of the Advanced WAN settings so that you can get an idea of the differences.

User level Advanced WAN settings

Figure 4: User level Advanced WAN settings
(click image to enlarge)

You can see that both User and Admin levels allow setting changes. The difference is in what each level is allowed to change.

Admin level Advanced WAN settings

Figure 5: Admin level Advanced WAN settings
(click image to enlarge)

The routing portion of the 2100 is pretty basic, although it has some features such as QoS and 802.1P VLAN tagging not typically found on basic routers. It handles static, DHCP and PPPoE WAN types and includes WAN MAC cloning capability. You can also put a client in DMZ and set port forwarding for 20 port ranges (TCP, UDP or both protocols).

But you'll find that firewall features are somewhat limited. There are no parental controls or even outgoing port filtering options and the QoS features don't allow you to limit the bandwidth allocated to specific applications or users.

Table 1 shows that routing performance is well matched to the limitations of the 2100's 10Mbps WAN and LAN ports. It also is fast enough for broadband speeds typically provided to most U.S. users.

Firmware Version: 2.0.5(d)
Test
Description
Transfer
Rate
(Mbps)
Response
Time
(msec)
UDP
stream
Throughput
(kbps)
Lost
data
(%)

WAN-LAN

7.2

2 (avg)
3 (max)

1000

0%

LAN-WAN

4.5

2 (avg)
4 (max)

Not avail.

%

Table 1: Routing Performance Test results

Note: Details of how we test can be found here.

Of particular note is the excellent UDP streaming performance (0% data loss at 1Mbps stream rate), which tells me that the Sipura designers understand what job #1 as far as the 2100's router is concerned! Note that the missing LAN-WAN UDP streaming results are not the 2100's fault, but due to Qcheck's inability to handle this test on some NAT+SPI routers.

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Recently got a RT-AC86u and installed with the latest Merlin (384.18), and noticed WebUI being unresponsive after a while. Restarting the httpd servic...
I've installed last version of Asus Merlin. I have tried to install pyload but now the default version of python in entware is version 3. Pyload still...
Asuswrt-Merlin 384.19 beta is now available (except for the RT-AX56U which won't be available for this release, due to outdated GPL code).The main cha...
Hi There,Update 2020/07/28Here we have new 386 rc2 beta for public test(so the old links are removed).link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1wv...
Is there a way to disable the pop-up when hovering the mouse pointer over threads?

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3