Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Wi-Fi Router Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Router Charts

Mesh System Charts

Click for Wi-Fi Mesh System Charts

Results - Uplink

I expected no throughput improvement in the uplink direction and that's about what I got, with one exception. The new "Prep" location showed a 17% improvement with beamforming enabled. While that looks impressive, keep in mind that represents only a 4 Mbps average throughput gain in the test.

Beamforming Test Summary - Uplink

Beamforming Test Summary - Uplink

However, the IxChariot composite plot of the two tests shows steadier throughput with beamforming enabled as the primary reason for higher average throughput.

Test Location "Prep" comparison - uplink

Test Location "Prep" comparison - uplink

The gallery below has all the comparison plots with beamforming enabled and disabled for all locations, uplink and downlink .

Closing Thoughts

To my surprise, it looks like beamforming can provide a slight performance improvement. And even more surprising, it worked with two different vendors' products (although both are Broadcom-based).

My results, however, come nowhere near those NETGEAR touted in its announcement last year of its "Beamforming+" upgrades. I've marked up the announcement's plot with percentage calculations of the improvements NETGEAR showed it obtained with its beamforming implementation.

NETGEAR Beamforming throughput improvement - annotated

NETGEAR Beamforming throughput improvement - annotated
[Source: NETGEAR announcement]

I can agree with the 12% improvement—the most I obtained. But I wasn't able to obtain a stable link at low enough levels to obtain the 51% and 85% (!) improvements NETGEAR claims it can deliver. Note that NETGEAR's plot represents bi-directional throughput and that might account for some of the difference.

So I guess I'll have to circle around to this again in a few weeks once NETGEAR releases its new R7000 firmware.

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2