Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Tests - Throughput vs. Range plots

26 January 2006 Update - Airgo said that they have found the behavior where TCP/IP connection pairs trade off throughput to be a function of IxChariot and the Windows TCP-IP stack and not throughput variation in the product itself. Subsequent additional testing with a single endpoint pair confirmed this.

I also have to say that I'm disappointed in the high downlink throughput variation. You can see the nature of the variation in the selected IxChariot plots shown below.

RangeMax 240 Location 1 downlink throughput

Figure 6: RangeMax 240 Location 1 downlink throughput
(click image to enlarge)

Figure 6 shows the particularly nasty nature of the throughput variation, with periodic throughput drops down to 4Mbps or so. I tried a few experiments to see if this was related to the use of two clients in the test or to a specific wired client. But the only thing common to the dropouts was that they occured during downlink tests only.

Figure 7 shows no sign of them during uplink tests, with the resulting much lower Relative Precision values.

RangeMax 240 Location 1 uplink throughput

Figure 7: RangeMax 240 Location 1 uplink throughput
(click image to enlarge)

Figures 6 and 7 are pretty much what the throughput profile looked like for my test Locations 1 through 3. Figures 8 and 9 show what things looked like during the Location 4 test run.

RangeMax 240 Location 4 downlink throughput

Figure 8: RangeMax 240 Location 4 downlink throughput
(click image to enlarge)

Once again, downlink doesn't fare as well as uplink, with the dropouts stretching into multiple seconds. The aggregate throughput is still impressive, but downlink variation of this magnitude would definitely break up the picture in streaming video applications.

RangeMax 240 Location 4 uplink throughput

Figure 9: RangeMax 240 Location 4 uplink throughput
(click image to enlarge)

I was bugged at the RM240's complete failure to establish a link in Location 5, so broke my "test-with-defaults" rule and changed the Wireless Interference Setting to Maximum Range.

RangeMax 240 Location 5 downlink throughput - with Maximum Range setting

Figure 10: RangeMax 240 Location 5 downlink throughput - with Maximum Range setting
(click image to enlarge)

Figures 10 and 11 show that I was rewarded with about 21Mbps of aggregate throughput.

RangeMax 240 Location 5 uplink throughput - with Maximum Range setting

Figure 11: RangeMax 240 Location 5 uplink throughput - with Maximum Range setting
(click image to enlarge)

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi all.Decided to do a M&M config on my 87U. Was on 384.11_2 and flashed the same firmware back on. Followed the M&M instructions to the letter. Also ...
Hi all,Thanks in advance for your help! I recently moved into a new home and signed up for Spectrum gig (about 970 down, 40 up), and I purchased an AX...
Hello,I recently got a MoCA 2.0 Bonded System, but for $120 and 'Gigabit' speeds advertised in a little disappointed. I had to run a new ethernet cabl...
Hello,I’m looking for capable WiFi access Points which could handle huge amount of concurrent connected clients without any problems. So imagine the f...
Have an 86U set up as my primary router and a 68U in the back of the house set up as an AP. I have roaming assistant turned on in both routers for bot...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3