Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Mesh Charts

Click for Mesh Charts

Throughput vs. Path Loss - Product Comparison

Most of you will probably be wondering whether to buy the 350N or spring for the dual-band 600N. So to provide a clear view, I limited the comparison throughput vs. path loss plots below to only those products.

The short answer is that the 600N outperforms the 350N in all cases, although the two run neck-and-neck for downlink at stronger signal levels in 40 MHz channel mode.

I should note, however, that performance is close enough that under actual use, you probably wouldn't notice the difference in performance between the 350N and 600N.

Use the Wireless Charts to generate other comparisons.

Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 20MHz channel
Click to enlarge image

Figure 13: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 20MHz channel

Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 20MHz channel
Click to enlarge image

Figure 14: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 20MHz channel

Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 40MHz channel
Click to enlarge image

Figure 15: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 40MHz channel

Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 40MHz channel
Click to enlarge image

Figure 16: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 40MHz channel

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2