Throughput vs. Path Loss - Product Comparison
Most of you will probably be wondering whether to buy the 350N or spring for the dual-band 600N. So to provide a clear view, I limited the comparison throughput vs. path loss plots below to only those products.
The short answer is that the 600N outperforms the 350N in all cases, although the two run neck-and-neck for downlink at stronger signal levels in 40 MHz channel mode.
I should note, however, that performance is close enough that under actual use, you probably wouldn't notice the difference in performance between the 350N and 600N.
Use the Wireless Charts to generate other comparisons.
Figure 13: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 20MHz channel
Figure 14: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 20MHz channel
Figure 15: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Downlink, 40MHz channel
Figure 16: Throughput vs. Path Loss product comparison - Uplink, 40MHz channel
More Wireless
Support Us!
Most Read This Week
Over In The Forums
Don't Miss These
-
First Peek At Wi-Fi 6: ASUS RT-AX88U & NETGEAR RAX80Read More
Updated - Our first look at the performance of NETGEAR's RAX80 and ASUS' RT-AX88U shows little benefit functioning as AC routers. -
5 Things To Know Before You Buy A Draft 11ax RouterRead More
Updated: The first draft 11ax routers are almost here. Take a little time to know what you might be buying into. -
160 MHz Wi-Fi Channels: Friend or Foe?Read More
Updated - 160 MHz channel bandwidth is an essential feature of 802.11ax. We take a look at whether it means trouble for your 11ac network. -
Wi-Fi Roaming Secrets RevealedRead More
Ever wonder what happens behind the scenes when Wi-Fi devices roam, or more likely don't? We'll show you why the "seamless" roaming Wi-Fi gear makers promise is still as elusive as a Yeti.
- 1
- 2
- 3