Lost Password? No account yet? Sign up! Why bother?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size

SmallNetBuilder - Small Network Help

  
Home arrow LAN & WAN arrow LAN & WAN Features arrow Which Router Reigns Supreme for P2P?
Which Router Reigns Supreme for P2P? Print E-mail
Tim Higgins   
April 19, 2006

Introduction

The recent introduction of our Hardware Router Charts has generally met with reader approval. However, not everyone was happy with the performance of at least one the top-rated routers. The short story is that the D-Link DGL-4300 seemed to severly limit upload throughput when used with the eMule P2P file sharing application.

The jury is still out as to whether the problem is in the router itself, or due to ISP bandwidth throttling. But the discussion raised a valid question about our current router test methodology. The current method uses a combination of Ixia's Qcheck and IxChariot applications, and tests upload (LAN-WAN) and download (WAN-LAN) throughput, response time and UDP streaming performance separately using two computers on a private LAN.

The P2P Contenders

The P2P Contenders

While this test accurately tests the best-case performance of a router, it has its weaknesses. The most basic weakness is that it doesn't reflect how a router responds to the simultaneous up and download traffic that routers see in real life. And the 500 kbps rate used in our UDP Streaming test doesn't reflect the performance requirements of IPTV and other video streaming applications that are becoming increasingly important consumer broadband applications.

But more to the point of this article is that our current methods don't test whether the products can handle the dozens of simultaneous up and download connections used by gaming and peer-to-peer file sharing applications. So I set out to both devise a test to gauge P2P performance and see how a collection of routers from the top of our chart would hold up under it.



Tags: P2P, router,

Related Articles:

Hardware Router Chart - June 2006 Update
Hardware Router Chart - Update 1
How We Test Hardware Routers 2006
How We Test Hardware Routers
Yes, the Linksys WRT54G V5 Really Is a Lousy Router
 

Most Read

 
 

Over At The Forums

Drobo vs NAS
Anyone knows of a NAS that works like a drobo? Im looking for a NAS that works a similar way. Data redundancy against HD failure...

Whazzup with DAP-1555? Has DLINK dropped it?
Im looking for a good wireless N access point and the 1522 intenna design got no connectivity for me. The 1555 has external antennas...

About the new Linksys mediahub
I was looking at the new Linksys media hub. It does look like everything I would need, with a simple clean interface. My big question...

what gigabit switch would be good for home use
I'm building a new house for the moment, and will need switch with at least 16 gigabit ports. My electrician proposed a switch of Allied...

6TB NAS for surveillance video
i am in the design phase for a fairly large ip surveillance camera project for a client. i am looking at three 24 port...

Slideshows

Linksys Media Hub LaCie 5big Network Jazinga IP PBX NETGEAR ReadyNAS Pro Western Digital ShareSpace QNAP TS-509 Pro More
Go Shopping with PriceGrabber

Get Email Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner once a day

 
 

Ldr:0.00173091888428, Rct:0.0453369617462, Sky:0.0492830276489, Tlink:0.270120859146, TopPG:0.27020406723, GQV:0.270351886749 seconds to load.