|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Features
For those of you who won't rest until you know that guest networks are really supported, here is the screenshot to prove it.
R6300 guest network settings
I also stumbled across a Performance Boost option in the Advanced Wireless settings page that is highlighted in the screenshot below. There is no explanation of what this does in the online help or User Manual. But here's what NETGEAR had to say about it:
The Performance Boost feature reduces the CPU utilization for WLAN processing on the router.
The typical scenario where it will help improve WiFi performance is where CPU is the bottleneck:
- Dual band concurrent performance
- Full speed 802.11ac performanceWe recommend keeping this feature enabled for best performance.
R6300 guest network settings
Not all routers support the same channels in 5 GHz, so I've summarized that and other wireless setting information in Table 2. Note that unlike the Buffalos, the R6300 doesn't support Channel 165 in 5 GHz, nor does it have an Auto channel setting in that band.![]()
| Setting | 5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
|---|---|---|
| Channel | 36, 40, 44, 48, 149, 153, 157, 161 | Auto, 1 - 11 |
| High-Throughput Mode (bandwidth) | Up to 289 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Up to 1300 Mbps |
Up to 54 Mbps Up to 217 Mbps Up to 450 Mbps |
| Security | None WPA-PSK [TKIP] WPA2-PSK [AES] WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES] |
None WEP (Up to 54 Mbps only) WPA-PSK [TKIP] WPA2-PSK [AES] WPA-PSK [TKIP] + WPA2-PSK [AES] |
Table 2: Wireless settings summary
Also unlike the Buffalo draft 11ac router and bridge, you can't adjust the R6300's transmit power, nor can you set the advertised base rates. You do, however, get the ability to adjust Fragmentation length, CTS/RTS Threshold and select short or long preamble. You can also schedule radio on/off periods for both radios on a daily basis and set wireless access filtering (MAC address) using a handy client pick list.
If you need a walkthrough on the Genie feature set, Craig's feature review of the WNDR3800 should give you what you need.
Routing Performance
[This is copied from the First Look for your convenience.]![]()
Routing performance for the R6300 using our standard test method is summarized in Table 3, along with Buffalo's draft 11ac router. The R6300 has higher routing throughput, if that's important to you. But NETGEAR has kept to its traditional 4,096 limit on simultaneous sessions.
| Test Description | R6300 | WZR-D1800H |
|---|---|---|
| WAN - LAN | 783 Mbps | 566 Mbps |
| LAN - WAN | 829 Mbps | 590 Mbps |
| Total Simultaneous | 808 Mbps | 590 Mbps |
| Maximum Simultaneous Connections | 4096 | 34,925 |
| Firmware Version | V1.0.0.68_1.0.16 | Ver.1.86 |
Table 3: Routing throughput
The IxChariot plot for the routing tests shows generally stable throughput, but with a few pronounced dips.
R6300 Routing throughput IxChariot plot summary
Storage Performance
I ran quick Windows filecopy tests using the standard NAS testbed to the R6300 with our standard Iomega UltraMax Pro drive configured in RAID 0 and formatted in FAT32 and NTFS. I pulled results from a few other high-end routers for comparison into Table 4.![]()
| R6300 | WNDR4500 | WZR-D1800H | RT-N66U | E4200V2 / EA4500 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT32 Write (MBytes/s) | 8.6 | 9.2 | 7.3 | 10 | 9.8 |
| FAT32 Read (MBytes/s) | 10.2 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 12 | 21.6 |
| NTFS Write (MBytes/s) | 11.3 | 6.7 | - | 17 | 20.1 |
| NTFS Read (MBytes/s) | 10.3 | 6.5 | - | 11 | 22.2 |
Table 4: File copy throughput
Cisco's E4200v2/EA4500 is still the champ for everything except FAT32 writes. But it looks like the R6300 has improved NTFS read and write performance over its WNDR4500 sibling. Since the two routers use the same CPU, I suspect that if I went back and retested the WNDR4500 with current firmware I might it now equals the R6300.
User reviews
Average user rating from: 1 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
R6300 Transfer Rates
I opted for the R6300 in large part due to antenna-less design (higher WAF). I've also had good luck with NETGEAR equipment in the past. I upgraded from a WNDR3700 v1 and also purchased an A6200 usb adapter for the wife's laptop. Router replacement was without incident; I was up and running in a matter of minutes. I used the same SSID and password so all wireless devices reconnected easily.
Wireless improvement was strong even without the A6200 adapter. With the adapter it was a 10-fold gain. Amazing speed.
Here's my wireless results:
File transfer 350MB single file to wireless-N 2.4 Ghz laptop, approx 25 ft away through 3 walls
WNDR3700 - 186 sec (approx 14 Mbs)
R6300 without A6200 adapter - 124 sec (approx 21 Mbs)
R6300 with A6200 (5Ghz AC) - 17 sec (approx 156 Mbs)
Well worth the investment. Stylish design although the bottom ports are a bit awkward. It may not have quite the strength of the ASUS model but wireless improvement cannot be questioned. Wired and other feature tests ongoing.
Related Items:
First Look: NETGEAR R6300 WiFi Router-802.11ac Dual Band GigabitNETGEAR Unveils More Draft 802.11ac Products
NETGEAR Antes Up With Its Draft 802.11ac Router
Cisco Linksys EA6500 Review - Part 2
WD My Net N900 5 GHz Retest











