|At a glance|
|Product||Western Digital WDBWNJ0000NBL My Net AC1300 HD Dual-Band Router [Website]|
|Summary||Broadcom-based AC1750 router with Gigabit ports and two USB 2.0 ports for file and printer sharing|
|Pros||• Dual USB ports|
• IPv6 support
• Good balance of wired and wireless performance
|Cons||• USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0 ports|
• No transmit power adjust or wireless on/off scheduling
Typical Price: $79 Compare Prices Check Amazon
It has taken me waaaay too long to review WD's draft 802.11ac router that it sent me lo, so many months ago. Unfortunately, it arrived at the point where I was switching over to the new wireless test process, which I wanted to test it with. So, my thanks to WD for being patient while I worked out the kinks in the new process.
The My Net AC1300 establishes the top of WD's My Net "HD" router line as shown in the comparison chart from WD's website below. We reviewed the N900 last July and the AC1300's routing features are essentially the same.
WD My Net Router family
The main difference between the two is on the wireless side with the AC1300 being a 3x3 802.11a/b/g/n/ac router vs. the N900's 3x3 802.11a/b/g/n radios. The AC1300's 2.4 GHz radio supports a 450 Mbps maximum link rate and its 5 GHz radio tops out at 1300 Mbps. Despite WD's moniker, our wireless router classification system slots the AC1300 as an AC1750 class product.
Fans of the N900's unique built-in seven port Gigabit switch will be sad to see only the usual four-port switch in the AC1300. But at least it remains Gigabit. Potential buyers may also have mixed feelings about the USB ports. The AC1300 still provides two, but they are still USB 2.0 vs. the faster USB 3.0 ports starting to appear in the new crop of draft 11ac routers based on Broadcom's newer router SoC.
Storage sharing functions still include SMB, FTP, DLNA, iTunes and "cloud" access via WD 2go. Printer sharing also still requires installation of WD Print Share software. But now there are versions for both Windows and Mac OS.
My Net AC1300 rear panel
The front panel contains a WPS button and handy status/activity LEDs.
My Net AC1300 front panel
Like all other first-generation draft 802.11ac routers, the AC1300 sports essentially the same all-Broadcom design. The FCC ID says the design comes from CyberTAN Technology, a seasoned Taiwanese OEM/ODM. Since the FCC ID photos are so fuzzy, I popped the top of my review sample after testing and took off two of the RF shields to confirm the processor and switch used.
WD My Net AC1300 inside
The key components are summarized in the table below. I was surprised to see so little flash memory compared to other draft 11ac routers, which usually have 128 MB. The mini PCI-e format of the 5 GHz radio belies the AC1300's design age. Later designs have the 5 GHz radio integrated onto the main board, as is the 2.4 GHz radio already.
|WD My Net AC1300|
|2.4 GHz Radio||- BCM4331
- Unidentifiable 2.4 - 2.5 GHz Power Amp (x3)
|5 GHz radio||- Broadcom BCM4360
- Unidentifiable 5 GHz Power Amp (x3)
Table 1: My Net AC1300 component summary
I didn't take the top off the RF sections of the two radios. The FCC photos are clear enough to show three devices within each radio's RF shield. I assume they are external power amplifiers, similar to those found in other first-gen Broadcom draft 11ac router designs. The photo's aren't clear enough to ID the specific manufacturers, however.
WD My Net AC1300 board detail
Related Items:NETGEAR R6300 Wireless Retest
WD Joins The Draft 11ac Parade
Linksys EA6500 Wireless Retest
Introducing SmallNetBuilder's Wireless Charts 2013
ASUS RT-AC66U Wireless Retest
Average user rating from: 1 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
|User Rating [Back to Top]||Overall:||2.3||Features :||5.0||Performance :||1.0||Reliability :||1.0|
Not worth it.
November 25, 2013
Report this review
I bought this router after reading through all this reviews. This router seems to be completely unstable. After working with WD support, they sent me an replacement (re-certified) unit and it was better than the previous one, but far from being stable or reliable.
This router does not even meet the normal usage norms. I have VOIP traffic issues, VPN disconnects, unable to have a sable RDP on VPN,
If you need P2P traffic or NAS, this router does not worth it. I have issues with this router even on the wired ports and that is too bad.
I spoke to a sales person in Fry's and he told me the WD is doing an EOL on this router, not sure how much of it is true and I see this model is on sale everywhere and hence I assume true.
When it works its speed is really good but not stable/reliable.
I think the router uses a Ubicom CPU and it is a multi-threaded CPU. Open-wrt or ddwrt does not seem to support this router either, since the software may not be complaint with such architecture. I'm not sure WD is having the same challenge as well.
Performance and reliability is 1 since there was no zero.