Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

Performance Tests

To test the DS-101's performance for networked data reading and writing , I used the iozone tool described on this page. In my specific case, the iozone test was running under OS X on my iBook which has 640 MB of RAM. The disk I installed in the DS-100 was a Maxtor 120GB, 7200 RPM drive with 8 MB cache and not supplied by Synology.

File system performance, i.e. how fast your computer can read / write data to a drive, depends on many factors that are specific to the system running the test. So to put the results in perspective, I also ran the same iozone tests against a Linksys NSLU2 and a Buffalo Technology Kuro Box using the same parameters and network connections. I didn't use the same hard-drive on the boxes, however, so the tests are not exactly apples-to-apples comparable. But the results should provide some idea of relative performance.

DS-101 Read Test
Figure 5: DS-101 Read Test
(click image for larger view)

Figures 5 and 6 show DS-101 transfer rate over varying file and record sizes for read and write respectively. Note that the zero-value areas at the left-front and right-rear of the graph are file and record sizes that weren't tested. Both show performance between 5,000 and 7,000 kBytes/sec.

DS-101 Write Test
Figure 6: DS-101 Write Test
(click image for larger view)

But, like I said, since performance is so system (including OS) dependent, a comparative look at the three NAS devices I tested is more informative. Figure 7 shows the DS-101, Kuro Box and NSLU2 / Maxtor USB write performance for a 128MB file size over varying record sizes. The DS-101 edges out the other two devices, but remember that the same hard drive isn't used in all devices.

Comparative write test
Figure 7: Comparative write test
(click image for larger view)

Figure 8 provides the read test comparison, which shows the Kuro Box besting the DS-101.

Comparative read test
Figure 8: Comparative read test
(click image for larger view)

I think the only safe conclusion is that both the DS-101 and Kuro Box provide better performance than the NSLU2 / Maxtor combination - which I'd attribute to the IDE vs. USB2.0 drive connection.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Using Asuswrt-Merlin 384.13 on a RT-AC66U-B1 router. "QoS WAN/LAN Bandwidth Monitor" is working well for internet traffic: I set media streaming stati...
Hi all, I used to run Merlin on my RT-AC66U years ago... I've upgraded to 3 AC68Us with two as AiMesh nodes. I run the primary router in AP Mode. Is t...
Assumption: Kill Switch will block traffic until such time as OpenVPN connection is re-established.Situation: Have the following configuration for Ope...
I do not want to open up port 80 and forward to traefik running on an internal pc unless the specific domain is used. For example if I go to the Exter...
I’ve been running Google Wifi for a while and really like the stability of it.I grown to miss a dedicated 5Ghz band thou.What would be best to go for ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3