Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

QNAP TS-110 Turbo NASThe QNAP TS-110 Turbo NAS has been added to the NAS Charts.

The TS-110 is a single-bay NAS that supports up to 2TB 3.5" SATA drives, based on an 800 MHz Marvell "Kirkwood" SoC. Unlike most other QNAP NASes, the TS-110 doesn't support 2.5" SATA drives.

QNAP TS-110 Turbo NAS

Figure 1 shows the indicators and ports, which include three USB 2.0, a single 10/100/1000 Ethernet port supporting up to 9K jumbo frames and a single eSATA port.

QNAP TS110 front and rear panels

Figure 1: QNAP TS110 front and rear panels

As noted above, the TS-110 uses a 800 MHz Marvell "Kirkwood" SoC (88F6281) which is joined by 256 MB of DDRII RAM and 16 MB of flash. The inside view in Figure 2 shows the Marvell SoC covered by a finned heatsink. The RAM and flash devices are also in view, as is the Marvell 88E116R, which supplies the Ethernet port.

QNAP TS-110 board
Click to enlarge image

Figure 2: QNAP TS-110 board

With the fan, heatsinked processor and only a single drive, the TS-110 is very quiet with virtually no fan noise. I did not hear drive head chatter when the Samsung Spinpoint F3 1 TB (HD103SJ) drive that QNAP shipped with the unit for test was active. Power consumption measured 12 W with the drives spinning and 7 W with the drive spun down after a programmable idle period.

Like all QNAP NASes, the TS-110 supports QNAP's entire Turbo NAS V3 feature set. Backup options include USB, rsync targets and Amazon S3, with FAT, EXT3, EXT4, NTFS and now HFS+ formatting options for attached drives. The TS-110 can also serve as Apple Time Machine storage. Media serving options include iPhone/Mobile access, Photo web server and UPnP / DLNA support.

Tests were run with 3.3.1 Build 0720T firmware using our standard test process. Write performance using iozone with a Gigabit LAN connection showed high write caching speeds. Write cache effects lasted up through the 256 MB RAM size, settling into a range of 84 - 47 Mbps from 512 MB through 4 GB file sizes. Read speeds had a slight falloff from the high to low 40 MB/s.

QNAP TS-110 throughput vs. file size

Figure 3: TS-110 throughput vs. file size

Average write performance using a Gigabit Ethernet connection measured 59.7 MB/s for file sizes between 32 MB and 4 GB, with cached behavior not included in the average calculation. Average read performance is significantly lower, measuring 43.8 MB/s.

File copy write speed measured 40 Mbps, as shown in Figure 5 below, with read doing a bit better at 45 MB/s, but ranking lower among current-generation single-drive NASes.

TS-110 file copy performance - write

Figure 4: TS-110 file copy performance - write

I tested backup to an Iomega UltraMax Pro drive configured in RAID 0 connected via both USB 2.0 and eSATA. USB-connected backup went about as fast as the bus will support at 21 - 24 MB/s with the RAID 0 array formatted FAT, EXT3 and NTFS. With an eSATA connection, however, I measured 40, 40 and 28 MB/s for FAT, EXT3 and NTFS, respectively.

I also tested network backup to a QNAP TS-239 Pro II rsync target and measured 13.4 MB/s, which is 2 - 5 MB/s slower than comparable single-drive Synology NASes. But this difference isn't significant enough to make much real-world difference in network backup speed. Finally, write and read speed to a 10 GB iSCSI target measured 33 MB/s and 38 MB/s, which are not too bad for a single-drive NAS.

Among single drive NASes, the TS-110's most direct competition are Synology's older DS109 and entry-level DS110j, which bracket it in price and performance. The DS110j is the TS-110's most direct equivalent, with 800 MHz Marvell Kirkwood CPU, but 128 MB of RAM vs. the TS-110's 256 MB. The DS109 differs only from the DS110j in using a 1.2 GHz Kirkwood CPU.

Using the Price vs. Performance Chart view, the DS109 and TS-110 are evenly matched for file copy write, but the DS110J and TS-110 are closer for file copy read.

If price is your primary factor, the DS110j would be your choice at (currently) around $140, followed by the TS-110 near $180, then the DS109 at slightly above $190. But note that the DS110j's file copy write speed (28.7 MB/s) was significantly lower than the other two NASes (40 MB/s). No matter which you choose, you'll be getting a nice, fully-featured BYOD NAS with 40 - 60 MB/s speeds.

QNAP's feature set has been already covered in other reviews, so there won't be a full review. You can always test drive QNAP's feature set via their online simulator. So use the NAS Charts to further explore the TS-110's performance and compare it to other products.

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out the new Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Featured Sponsors


Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I picked up an 86U last week and finally got around to doing some testing of the wifi throughput vs my 68U. The test parameters are listed in the scre...
Hi all, not sure if this is a bug but posting anyways :-IE11 browserI've just updated my RT-AC87U to v380.69 and did a reset/fresh start but now a set...
I am looking to take my old router and use it as a dual-router setup to run VPN for our streaming media devices. The other router will handle main net...
Ive been reading a lot about my new Asus AC3200 specifically regarding Smart Connect and Band Steering. Based on my research I’ve determined turning S...
Recently I had very strange problem with Skype, which I never used during last 6-7 yearsI am a road warrior, so I set-up a private OpenVPN server on m...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Get Backblaze Now!