Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

NAS Reviews

Performance - Summaries

4.0.1 firmware was loaded on the TS-420 for our standard NAS test process. As noted earlier, all testing was done on the TS-420 sample. The TS-420 tests used four drives configured in single RAID 0, 5 and 10 volumes. The TS-220 tests used two drives in single RAID 0 and 1 volumes. The TS-120 tests used one drive.

As I found with the TS-421, times to completely build and resync 4 x 3 TB RAID 5 and 10 volumes were quite long at 17h 20m and 23h 5m, respectively. Build and resync for 2 x 3 TB RAID 0 and 1 volumes were 32 minutes and two hours, respectively. Unlike Thecus and Synology, QNAP does not offer the option to skip a bad block test, which can speed volume resync times significantly.

Since we have the NAS Ranker, I'll only make a few observations about each benchmark summary. The TS-420's below shows best file copy throughput with RAID 0 (53 MB/s) and worst with RAID 5 (34 MB/s). Read is best again for RAID 0 (79 MB/s) with both RAID 5 and 10 read about 10 MB/s lower. NASPT file copy write performance is lower across the board for write and about the same for read.

QNAP TS-420 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-420 Benchmark Summary

I was not able to run the Network backup (rsync) tests on the TS-420 because QNAP has not fixed the bug that prevents selecting a remote target directory yet.

With two drives representing the TS-220's performance, RAID 0 performance is in the same ballpark as with four drives. Windows file copy for RAID 1 measured 42 MB/s for write and 66 MB/s for read. NASPT file copy was a tad lower (40 MB/s) for write and almost 15 MB/s higher for read.

QNAP TS-220 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-220 Benchmark Summary

With only a single drive, both write and read performance dipped to 46 and 70 MB/s for Windows file copy and 33 MB/s and 65 MB/s for NASPT file copy.

QNAP TS-120 Benchmark Summary

QNAP TS-120 Benchmark Summary

More NAS

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Running 384_12 (latest stable) on an AC88 with Diversion & Skynet with 2GB swap file. Had a crash (early in the morning hours with no load):kernel: Ou...
Hello,I want to access one of my home devices with a LAN connection from my cell when I am outside. I tried using my Asus RT-AC88U's original firmware...
Hi, just got the subject error while running a 'robocopy' backup script against a samba shared drive on my rt-ax88u. I am not posting this in the alph...
Hi do anyone know is there difference when the aimesh node logo turn blue or just normal color?It is because i always lost my aimesh node (lost connec...
Ramblings of an Old Man … RuckusWhere else can an old man ramble on about computers and networks? (My wife tolerates it only to the point that it puts...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3