Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Wireless Tests - More MIMO comparisons

But the real question on the minds of many readers is how RangeMax stacks up against other current MIMO offerings. To probe this, I gathered data from my previous tests of Belkin's Pre-N and Linksys' SRX products (True MIMO based), plotted it along with data from two different RangeMax runs and threw in a Super-G+XR+AR run done with NETGEAR's Double 108 products for good measure. Figures 19 and 20 tell the tale.

Indoor MIMO throughput comparison - Downlink

Figure 19: Indoor MIMO throughput comparison - Downlink
(click on image to enlarge)

The downlink graph (Figure 19) shows that all MIMO methods handily beat out normal Super-G, even with XR and AR enabled. But I find it hard to declare a definite winner of the MIMO pack, with all the criss-crossing going on. If you stare long enough at the enlarged plot, though, you might say that the Linksys SRX had a slight edge.

Indoor MIMO throughput comparison - Uplink

Figure 20: Indoor MIMO throughput comparison - Uplink
(click on image to enlarge)

Figure 20 is a bit more interesting in that it doesn't show as clear an advantage of MIMO over regular old Super-G under best-case conditions (Location 1). And it again shows RangeMax (in plain Auto108 mode) holding its own among the True MIMO competition.

I didn't do as much outdoor testing of RangeMax as I did for True MIMO products and didn't test to see which ultimately went farther. But Figures 21 and 22 show a definite pattern of results for the testing that I did perform.

Outdoor MIMO throughput comparison - Downlink

Figure 21: Outdoor MIMO throughput comparison - Downlink
(click on image to enlarge)

You don't see any Linksys SRX results because I didn't do any outdoor testing on it. But the conclusions I draw from this data are:

  • RangeMax provides a definite improvement over normal Super-G as distance increases (signal levels drop)
  • XR helps vs. hurts performance as distance increases
  • True MIMO maintained throughput over the distance tested better than RangeMax

Outdoor MIMO throughput comparison - Uplink

Figure 22: Outdoor MIMO throughput comparison - Uplink
(click on image to enlarge)

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

I use a RT AC 88 U with Merlin magic (14.2) . I have a bit of trouble connecting to either the 2 or 5 g radio from time to time . I'll try and explain...
I have an RT 86u router running 383.14_2.Anytime the router reboots it looses the Open VPN server users. They then have to all be re-entered.Same thin...
Hello everyone at SNBI'm looking to maximize performance of streaming from a local Xbox One X server on ethernet to a wireless (wi-fi AX 2x2, surface ...
Hello Folks,I am not ( as yet) an ASUS router user ... I am presently on Netgrear stuff and making the switch to the new system . I am waiting for Ama...
Hello, recently purchased Asus GT-ax11000to replace my aging nighthawk r7000. The new router covers basically the same distance which covers my whole ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3