Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Stress Test

For the last test, I ran a stress test that I've run on other routers, the WRT610N included, to see if wired and wireless bandwidth affect each other. The setup is the same as shown in Figure 9, but this time I ran only one stream each on the 2.4 and 5 GHz radios and added single LAN to WAN and WAN to LAN wired routing tests.

I first ran the tests with no bandwidth limits, i.e. blasting each stream as fast as it would go, which produced the results shown in Figure 11. The test starts the 2.4 GHz downlink stream first, then at 30 second intervals adds the 5 GHz wireless, wired LAN to WAN, then wired WAN to LAN streams. The wireless streams appear to share bandwidth fine, as you'd expect from the previous wireless maximum bandwidth test above.

Simultaneous 2.4 and 5 GHz plus routing - full bandwidth
Click to enlarge image

Figure 11: Simultaneous 2.4 and 5 GHz plus routing - full bandwidth

But as soon as the first wired routing stream starts, wireless bandwidth on both radios is knocked down significantly. When the second routing stream is added, wireless throughput ends up being reduced by more than 50%.

Since it's unlikely that any router in a consumer setting would be connected to such a fast Internet connection, I re-ran the test, this time limiting the WAN > LAN speed to 50 Mbps and LAN > WAN to 5 Mbps, as you might have from a fiber-based ISP. Figure 12 shows what happened.

Simultaneous 2.4 and 5 GHz plus routing - routing bandwidth limits
Click to enlarge image

Figure 12: Simultaneous 2.4 and 5 GHz plus routing - routing bandwidth limits

When the 5 Mbps LAN to WAN traffic starts one minute into the test, both wireless streams seem unaffected. But when the 50 Mbps WAN to LAN traffic starts, both wireless streams get knocked down ~ 10 Mbps each.

So the lesson here is that the E3000 doesn't have unlimited bandwidth, which should be no surprise. But it appears that unless you have a very busy LAN and a very fast Internet connection, you won't run into the limits that I found.

Closing Thoughts

For everyone who has been asking for a test of the WRT610N V2, well, you finally have it, since the E3000 is the same product with a new name. While the E3000 is a decent router and I'm sure that Cisco will sell plenty of 'em, it isn't as good as NETGEAR's WNDR3700, which is still the best-performing dual-band simultaneous N router that I've tested so far.

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

Hi all.Decided to do a M&M config on my 87U. Was on 384.11_2 and flashed the same firmware back on. Followed the M&M instructions to the letter. Also ...
Hi all,Thanks in advance for your help! I recently moved into a new home and signed up for Spectrum gig (about 970 down, 40 up), and I purchased an AX...
Hello,I recently got a MoCA 2.0 Bonded System, but for $120 and 'Gigabit' speeds advertised in a little disappointed. I had to run a new ethernet cabl...
Hello,I’m looking for capable WiFi access Points which could handle huge amount of concurrent connected clients without any problems. So imagine the f...
Have an 86U set up as my primary router and a 68U in the back of the house set up as an AP. I have roaming assistant turned on in both routers for bot...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3