Storage Performance

Now comes the fun part: performance tests. I thought I was prepared to test all three connection flavors—USB 2.0, USB 3.0 and even eSATA—using my standard Startech USB 3.0 eSATA to SATA Hard Drive Docking Station [SATDOCKU3SEF] with a WD Velociraptor WD3000HLFS 300 GB drive.

However, after multiple attempts with the drive formatted both FAT32 and NTFS, the WRT's USB connection screen kept reporting that the drive had an invalid format. Since I had reported this problem in the EA6900 review, you would think the problem would not carry forward to the WRT1900AC. But apparently it has.

I fell back to successfully using a 500 GB WD My Passport (WDBKXH5000ABK-01) to run tests [NAS test details] with the drive formatted in FAT32 and NTFS and connected to both USB 2.0 and 3.0 ports. Testing the eSATA port will just have to wait.

Updated 4/15/14: After further experimentation and consulting with Linksys, I discovered a badly formatted drive in the Startech dock was causing my previous failed attempts. It looked ok to Windows' Storage Manager, but it reported an odd mix of filesystem types to the WRT1900AC. I swapped in another WD Velociraptor that did not have the problem and was able to run all tests, including eSATA. The tables have been updated with the new test results.

Table 4 summarizes USB 2.0 performance and includes the WRT1900AC's AC1900 competitors. The WRT1900AC clearly wins in this comparison, with essentially 30 MB/s performance both read and write and both formats.

Switching to USB 3.0 results, the WRT smokes the competition with a 20+ MB/s advantage in all tested modes over the now next-best NETGEAR R7000 Nighthawk. With 60+ MB/s performance, the WRT could comfortably be used instead of a dedicated inexpensive NAS.

Finally, the eSATA results, which are comparable to USB 3.0, for the most part. For those thinking using an SSD would improve these results, forget it. The drive and dock used are capable of testing well over 100 MB/s.

Routing Performance

Routing throughput was measured using our standard router test process with the router using 1.1.7.160177 firmware. Table 6 summarizes the results and once again includes the Linksys EA6900, NETGEAR R7000 and ASUS RT-AC68U for comparison.

All these routers have plenty of routing throughput, but the WRT1900AC comes in with the lowest total simultaneous throughput. Not that 975 Mbps is that shabby, by any means! The 30,557 simultaneuous connections represent the ever-shifting limit of our test. (BTW, I'd be happy to change the test method for this test, if I could find a reliable one that didn't require test gear costing $100K+!)

The IxChariot unidirectional composite plot for the WRT1900AC shows LAN to WAN throughput has a sizable lead over WAN to LAN.

Linksys WRT1900AC routing throughput unidirectional summary

The WRT1900AC simultaneous up/downlink benchmark plot shows a definite preference for LAN to WAN among the widely varying throughput in both directions.

Linksys WRT1900AC routing throughput bidirectional summary

Introduction, Inside Features Features-more Storage Performance, Routing Performance Wireless Performance Wireless Performance-more, Closing

• Start
• Prev
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next
• End

Related Articles

• AC1900 Router Retest Redux
• TP-LINK Archer C9 Reviewed
• Linksys WRT1900ACS Dual-Band Gigabit Router Reviewed
• TRENDnet TEW-818DRU AC1900 Dual Band Wireless Router Reviewed
• Linksys EA6900 Wireless AC Router SMART Wi-Fi Dual Band AC1900 Reviewed

Buy This Product From Amazon