Like every other website on the planet, SmallNetBuilder uses cookies. Our cookies track login status, but we only allow admins to log in anyway, so those don't apply to you. Any other cookies you pick up during your visit come from advertisers, which we don't control.
If you continue to use the site, you agree to tolerate our use of cookies. Thank you!

Router Charts

Click for Router Charts

Router Ranker

Click for Router Ranker

NAS Charts

Click for NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

Click for NAS Ranker

More Tools

Click for More Tools

Wireless Reviews

Performance - more

5 GHz downlink shows the extender link with high variation at the start of the run, then settling down. Extended throughput is 34% lower.

NETGEAR EX6150 throughput - 5 GHz down

NETGEAR EX6150 throughput - 5 GHz down

The 5 GHz uplink plot is the clearest example of expected extender throughput, with the extended link 47% lower than the extender.

NETGEAR EX6150 throughput - 5 GHz up

NETGEAR EX6150 throughput - 5 GHz up

FastLane Performance

I also tested the EX6150's "FastLane" feature. The first plot shows extended wireless throughput using the 2.4 GHz radio to connect back to the base router and the 5 GHz radio to connect to the extended test client. I suspect the instability shown is coming from the 2.4 GHz backhaul, since previous plots using 5 GHz radios only were nice and steady.

NETGEAR EX6150 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 2.4 GHz backhaul

NETGEAR EX6150 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 2.4 GHz backhaul

Switching over to using 5 GHz backhaul provides higher net throughput in both cases, but not very stable connections. The big dropouts in 2.4 GHz link again indicates some unhappiness somethere in that chain.

NETGEAR EX6150 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 5 GHz backhaul

NETGEAR EX6150 extended throughput via FastLane w/ 5 GHz backhaul

Seems to me the 2.4 GHz connection is the weak link in both FastLane configurations and overall for the EX6150.

Closing Thoughts

The EX6150 earns a SmallNetBuilder Ranked #1 award, because it had the highest results in all ranked performance categories.

SmallNetBuilder Ranked #1

But given the EX6150's 2.4 GHz wonkiness, I'd also give Linksys' RE6700 a look. Although it doesn't produce the EX6150's higher 5 GHz throughput, its 2.4 GHz performance is as good or better. The RE6700 also provides a pass-through power outlet, CrossBand technology that supports simultaneous opposite-band backhaul on both bands and DLNA audio streaming.

Ranker Performance Summary Comparison

Ranker Performance Summary Comparison

More Wireless

Wi-Fi System Tools
Check out our Wi-Fi System Charts, Ranker and Finder!

Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Over In The Forums

ChangelogCode: Firmware version 3.0.0.4.384_81351- Release Note - 1. Fixed a DDoS vulnerability.2. Fixed Let's Encrypt related bugs.3. Fixed folder c...
I posted this inquiry on the ZTE forum but got no replies yet.I am having issues changing the firmware on my router.The contract with the ISP ended an...
An update notifier "popped" up today when I logged into my Router. ( GUI )RT-AC66U_B1 Current Version : 3.0.0.4.384_81351-gcb63868This will probably b...
Hi all, hope everyone is doing fine today.I have a little issue with my iptables which as been setup as a killswitch in the event my VPN fails. The ki...
Hello,I am using an ASUS RT-AC66U in Access Point Mode to hardwire a Meraki Access Point to my Meraki Security Appliance. The Access Points work fine ...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3