Router Charts

Router Charts

Router Ranker

Router Ranker

Router Chooser

Router Chooser

NAS Charts

NAS Charts

NAS Ranker

NAS Ranker

More Tools

More Tools

Other Features

Introduction

You're probably as tired of reading year-end I-gotta-write-something-but-I-don't-feel-like-it articles as I am. But why should SmallNetBuilder readers be left out?

Since I'm often accused of being too cranky and not positive enough in my reviews and commentary on the SOHO / SMB networking industry, I thought I'd continue in that direction for my year-end review. So here are 10 things that we didn't see happen in 2007 (in no particular order).

1 - Buffalo back in the U.S. Wireless game

Buffalo Technology's ongoing legal woes with Australia's CSIRO resulted in an injunction that forced Buffalo to halt all shipments of wireless LAN products in the U.S. market around the end of October [article].

Buffalo finally quietly issued a statement toward the end of November that said it "believes that the Court of Appeals will ultimately issue a decision in Buffalo’s favor, finding CSIRO’s patent invalid and not infringed and vacating the injunction". But a lot can happen in the "7-12 months" that Buffalo says that this decision could take. By the time Buffalo can sell wireless products again, will anyone care?

2 - A good reason to upgrade to Vista

Familiar Vista message

It's pretty well accepted that Vista hit the market with a thud, despite all of Microsoft's attempts to convince us all to the contrary. Our look at the "improvements" that Vista brings in networking didn't find any advantages and plenty of disadvantages, or at least, annoyances in making the switch. But it sure brought the Vista fanboys out in force.

3 - The Wi-Fi Alliance own up to its screw-up

When I found a hole in the Wi-Fi Alliance's 802.11n Draft 2.0 certification test suite back in October, it didn't seem to be a significant issue to any other publication. But the hole allowed at least one product—Linksys' dual-band WRT600N router—to be shipped with its 2.4 GHz band radio defaulting to the legacy-unfriendly 40 MHz bandwidth mode.

Despite multiple requests for comment, the Wi-Fi Alliance has yet to respond. I suppose I wouldn't either, if someone found an obvious problem that should have been caught long ago.

More Stuff

Featured Sponsors




Support Us!

If you like what we do and want to thank us, just buy something on Amazon. We'll get a small commission on anything you buy. Thanks!

Top Performing Routers

AC3200
AC2600
AC1900
AC1750
AC1200

Top Performing NASes

NoRAID
RAID1
RAID5

Over In The Forums

Hi all, I am new to this website (actually a newbie about routers/networking too). I recently bought ASUS RT-3100 with high hopes but so far I am very...
When I go to certain websites and it auto recognizes my location (zip) it is always wrong. I am thinking this is because I don't use my ISP's DNS serv...
I currently have an AC1750-based network made up of two Asus RT-AC66U routers (one primary, one in media bridge mode) and a Buffalo AirStation AC medi...
OK - I am quite new to networking. I have a bridge question. Current setup: A RT-N66U in my living room where the cable modem is located. But I ha...
I am on AC66U (Broadcom BCM5300 chip rev 1), Merlin 380.62. Configured OpenVPN client to connect to a VPN service provider. I was on 380.61 and the O...

Don't Miss These

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3