Wireless Features - more
The Advanced Wireless settings (Figure 13) are generally more understandable than some of the options exposed by the Buffalo Nfiniti Dual-Band router. You get High / Medium / Low Transmit Power settings and the usual set of tweaks for Beacon Period, RTS and Fragmentation Thresholds and DTIM Interval.
Figure 13: Advanced Wireless settings
It's nice to see the L2 Isolation control, which keeps wireless clients from being able to communicate with each other (default disabled). The simple WMM Enable control (default enabled) is interesting to see, given all of the Ubicom intelligent QoS capability built into the 655. But ya can't get Wi-Fi Certified without supporting WMM, so there it is. Someday, I have to see if WMM really does anything useful.
The last option, Short GI, is enabled by default and used to set the time that the receiver waits for RF reflections to settle out before sampling data. The D-Link help offers the following as guidance in setting this feature:
Using a short (400ns) guard interval can increase throughput. However, it can also increase error rate in some installations, due to increased sensitivity to radio-frequency reflections. Select the option that works best for your installation.
I left this in its default for all of my testing and didn't notice any problems that could be attributed to it.
Note that if you set the 802.11 mode to 802.11g only or mixed 11g / n, then an Extra Wireless Protection checkbox will appear that controls the protection mechanism for 802.11b WLANs that is part of the 802.11g spec.
In addition to the WMM support mentioned above, the 655 supports Ubicom's WISH (Wireless Intelligent Stream Handling) technology, which according to Ubicom "automatically and continuously looks for media streams on the wireless link and ensures that they are transmitted at the appropriate priority". Put another way, WISH applies the same automatic prioritization technology that the 655 applies to upstream Internet traffic, to traffic between the 655 and wireless clients. However, WISH won't work miracles, or create bandwidth. So if you're trying to run an HD stream over a 10 Mbps wireless connection, WISH isn't going to keep you from getting a choppy and unwatchable picture.
Finally, note that D-Link has taken the typical wireless MAC Address Filtering and applied it to both wireless and wired connections. The Network Filter feature can be set to allow or deny listed clients and provides pick lists of any clients that have obtained addresses from the 655's DHCP server. Note that this feature does not work when the 655 is in "Bridge" (AP) mode. So, in that case, you give up any MAC address filtering.
Related Items:Slideshow: D-Link DIR-628 RangeBooster N Dual Band Router
Netgear WNR834B RangeMax NEXT Wireless-N Router Review
Netgear WNR854T RangeMax NEXT Wireless-N Router - Gigabit Edition Revi
Slideshow: Netgear WNDR3300 RangeMax Dual-Band Wireless N Router
Slideshow: Trendnet 300Mbps Wireless N Home Router
Average user rating from: 2 user(s)
NOTE! Please post product reviews from actual experience only.
Questions, review comments and opinions about products not based on actual use will not be published.
|User Rating [Back to Top]||Overall:||2.7||Features :||3.0||Performance :||3.0||Reliability :||2.0|
May 25, 2011
Report this review
poor coverage, poor stability
Great Wireless Coverage, Unreliable as A Router Due To Firmware Update
February 20, 2011
Report this review
I was given a DIR-655 router from a friend in exchange for setting up a WRT54G as a repeater bridge to extend their network. I took the DIR-655 home and set it up as a router in my home network. It worked well and the wireless coverage was excellent.
For some reason after a few days, I checked the firmware version and found it to be a years old version so I upgraded to the latest version, 1.34NA I believe it was, mistake!
With the new firmware on the router it would only run for a few days before dropping my connection to the internet and requiring a reboot. I had tried quite a few other routers in this location that never had this sort of reliability problem.
Then I thought that I'd just simply roll back to a previous version of the firmware and this is not possible with D-Link's firmware system for some reason. I then replaced the DIR-655 with a WRT320N which has been excellent and very reliable.
I'm still using the DIR-655 right now in another location and capacity and it's been doing a great reliable job so all is not lost on this model. I've disabled it's routing features and I'm using it as a wireless AP and this works great.
With this box the hardware is nice but the firmware is not so hot and that's a shame because it's been an excellent wireless AP for me and I have it running in a large house with plaster walls etc.